Is fakaheda.eu Safe? Security Analysis for FakaHeda.eu
Check if fakaheda.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

AI Summary
FakaHeda.eu is a Czech-based game hosting provider specializing in rental of game and voice servers, data hosting, and virtual private servers. Established since 2006, it serves a regional audience of gamers and server renters with a professional and consistent online presence. The website is well-structured, multilingual, and provides a control panel for customers to manage their services. Technically, the site uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Rails framework, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Ads with a privacy-first consent approach. Security posture is moderate with CSRF protections and cookie consent but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid privacy policies, but the domain and website appear legitimate and consistent with the business claims. Overall, the site is professional, GDPR compliant, and trustworthy with room for security enhancements.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The company operates in the technology sector focusing on game server hosting, targeting gamers and communities requiring dedicated game and voice servers. Its business model is service-based with recurring revenue from server rentals. The presence of multiple microsites and partnerships with known gaming and technology brands indicates a solid partnership ecosystem. The company maintains a medium-sized operation with a focus on quality and customer service, evidenced by a control panel and active communication channels like forums and Discord. Growth indicators include continuous service updates and seasonal promotions. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for managed support via forms and tickets.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
FakaHeda.eu demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. The site uses HTTPS (implied by external Google scripts loaded over HTTPS) and implements CSRF tokens in forms, indicating awareness of common web security practices. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR, denying tracking by default until user consent. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The site would benefit from enhanced security headers, documented incident response, and regular third-party script audits.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
FakaHeda.eu
Pronájem kvalitních herních a komunikačních serverů s širokou nabídkou nadstandardních služeb
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
basic
basic
good
Security Assessment
- CSRF tokens in forms
- cookie consent with opt-in/out
- denied default Google ad and analytics storage
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM8 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings