Skip to main content

Is fan.ke a Scam? Security Check Results - fan.ke Reviews

fan.ke favicon

Is fan.ke Safe? Security Analysis for fan.ke

Check if fan.ke is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseBodis Ads+1 more
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 7:29:46 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website fan.ke is a newly registered domain primarily serving as a parked domain with advertising content. It lacks substantive business information, contact details, or user engagement features. The site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript technologies with integration of Google Adsense and Bodis advertising networks. The technical infrastructure is minimal and hosted via Dynadot INC, consistent with domain parking services. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and DNSSEC not enabled. Privacy compliance is limited with a basic privacy policy but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site presents low business credibility and minimal content quality, suitable only as a placeholder domain. Strategic recommendations include improving security headers, implementing privacy and cookie consent mechanisms, and adding business contact information to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseBodis AdsDynadot DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

fan.ke operates as a domain parking service with monetization through advertising networks such as Google Adsense and Bodis. The business model focuses on generating revenue from ad clicks rather than providing direct services or products. The domain is very new, indicating no established market presence or competitive positioning. There are no partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent company information available. The target audience is general internet users who may visit the parked domain. The lack of business details and contact information limits the ability to assess growth potential or strategic partnerships.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, which is a positive security baseline. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are important to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. DNSSEC is not enabled, leaving DNS queries vulnerable to spoofing. No forms or user inputs are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. Privacy compliance is minimal with no cookie consent mechanism and a basic privacy policy that does not explicitly address GDPR requirements. Incident response and security policy information are absent, indicating low security maturity. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires enhancements to meet modern standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Website appears to be a parked domain or placeholder with relevant content and ads.

Key Services:
domain parkingadvertising
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseBodis AdsDynadot DNS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsenseBodis
Tracking Pixels:
Google Adsense cookie.js
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a parked domain with minimal content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 88 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
low(93 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:199.59.243.228
Name Servers:
ns1.dyna-ns.net
ns2.dyna-ns.net
SOA:Serial: 2025073101, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:360ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript without use of advanced frameworks or CMS platforms. Advertising scripts from Google Adsense and Bodis are integrated for monetization. The hosting provider is Dynadot INC, a domain registrar and parking service. Performance is moderate with no advanced optimization detected. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with minimal responsive design features. SEO optimization is limited to basic meta tags without structured data or Open Graph tags. The site lacks forms or interactive elements, reducing complexity but also limiting functionality. Technical debt is low due to minimal features but modernization opportunities exist to improve user experience and security.
Analyze Another Website
fan.ke Security Analysis - Moderate Risk (Score: 53/100) | fan.ke Safety Check | OffSeq