Skip to main content

Is fanczs.com a Scam? Security Check Results - fanczs.com Reviews

fanczs.com favicon

Is fanczs.com Safe? Security Analysis for fanczs.com

Check if fanczs.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
ReactArco DesignGarfish Micro FrontendsJavaScriptCSS
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 9:25:07 AM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website mmo.fanczs.com appears to be a technical portal or internal platform likely related to a larger corporate or organizational infrastructure. It utilizes modern web technologies such as React and micro frontend architecture (Garfish), hosted on ByteDance and FanChen static content delivery networks. The site lacks public-facing business information, contact details, or policies, indicating it is not intended for general public commercial use. The absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain reduces its trustworthiness and legitimacy from a public perspective. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and compliance documentation. Overall, the site is functional for internal or technical purposes but lacks transparency and compliance features expected for public-facing business websites.

Detected Technologies

ReactArco DesignGarfish Micro FrontendsJavaScriptCSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of visible business information, the website does not provide insights into market positioning, revenue streams, or customer segments. The technical nature and domain suggest it may serve as a backend or supplier portal for a larger enterprise, possibly related to e-commerce or supply chain operations given the module names in scripts. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable from the content. The business model appears to be B2B or internal operations support rather than direct consumer engagement.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS but does not present security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is available, limiting transparency. The use of third-party scripts from known CDNs is noted, but no vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Privacy compliance is lacking due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is basic and would benefit from enhanced headers, documented policies, and incident response readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms to improve compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactArco DesignGarfish Micro FrontendsJavaScriptCSS
Frameworks:
React
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
ByteDance APM
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
ByteDance APM (bytedapm.com)
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a technical portal with minimal visible content and no public business information

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0"

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

10/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +include:_netblocks.m.feishu.cn ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarcrp@gmail.com
Forensic Reports:dmarcrp@gmail.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:23.213.161.216, 23.213.161.214
Name Servers:
ns1.alidns.comDNS only
ns2.alidns.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: m1.feishu.cn
SOA:Serial: 2025032613, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:489ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +include:_netblocks.m.feishu.cn ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website employs a modern React-based frontend with micro frontend architecture using Garfish, indicating a modular and scalable design. It leverages Arco Design components and is hosted on ByteDance and FanChen CDNs, suggesting robust infrastructure. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and CDN usage. However, the site lacks SEO metadata and accessibility enhancements. The absence of CMS or public content management features suggests it is a specialized portal rather than a public website. Technical debt appears low but opportunities exist to improve metadata, accessibility, and security configurations.
Analyze Another Website