Skip to main content

Is fanextra.com a Scam? Security Check Results - FanExtra Reviews

fanextra.com favicon

Is fanextra.com Safe? Security Analysis for FanExtra

Check if fanextra.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
jQuery 1.4Visual Website OptimizerFancyboxWordPress
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 9:38:29 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

FanExtra is a niche membership platform focused on providing design tutorials, critiques, and high-quality design resources to digital artists and designers. Established in 2010, it offers a subscription-based model targeting users seeking to improve their design skills through curated content and community engagement. The website is built on WordPress and uses legacy JavaScript libraries alongside marketing tools such as Google Analytics and Visual Website Optimizer. While the site presents a professional design and clear navigation, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate with domain protections in place but missing modern security headers and DNSSEC. Overall, the site is accessible and safe for general audiences with no adult content detected.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.4Visual Website OptimizerFancyboxWordPress

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

FanExtra operates in the digital design education sector, leveraging a subscription model to monetize exclusive tutorials and resources. Its market position is that of a specialized content provider with a loyal user base. The business benefits from long domain tenure and positive member testimonials, indicating customer satisfaction and trust. The absence of detailed contact information and formal policies suggests room for improvement in transparency and compliance. The use of affiliate programs and marketing tools indicates active efforts to grow and engage its audience. The hosting provider and technology stack are standard for small to medium-sized content platforms.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates basic security maturity with domain-level protections such as clientDeleteProhibited status flags and a reputable registrar. However, the lack of DNSSEC, outdated JavaScript libraries, and absence of security headers reduce its security robustness. No HTTPS enforcement details were found in the HTML content, which is a critical area to verify. The site does not display privacy or security policies, limiting its compliance with GDPR and other regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, indicating potential gaps in security governance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet modern standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

FanExtra

Description:

FanExtra is a membership-based online platform offering unlimited design critiques, tutorials, courses, and high-quality design resources such as tutorial source files, advanced tutorials, vector designs, icon sets, textures, brushes, and Photoshop patterns. It targets designers seeking to improve their skills and access premium design content.

Key Services:
Design tutorialsDesign critiquesHigh-quality design resource filesDesigner discounts
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.4Visual Website OptimizerFancyboxWordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
45/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of clientDeleteProhibited and other domain status flags to prevent unauthorized changes

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsVisual Website Optimizer
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Visual Website Optimizer
Marketing Tools:
Visual Website Optimizer
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a membership-based design tutorial and resource platform.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:78.110.173.82 ip4:94.229.72.243 +a +mx +ip4:212.71.252.171 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 85 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

25 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
15 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(186 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:78.110.173.82
Name Servers:
ns1.thiswebhost.com
ns2.thiswebhost.com
ns3.thiswebhost.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: fanextra.com
SOA:Serial: 2025090202, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:91ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:78.110.173.82 ip4:94.229.72.243 +a +mx +ip4:212.71.252.171 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with a legacy theme and uses older JavaScript libraries like jQuery 1.4, which may introduce security vulnerabilities. It integrates third-party marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Visual Website Optimizer. Hosting is managed via ThisWebHost as indicated by nameservers. The site shows moderate performance and basic SEO and accessibility features. There is an opportunity to modernize the tech stack, improve mobile responsiveness, and implement security best practices to reduce technical debt and operational risks.
Analyze Another Website