Is farmacista33.it Safe? Security Analysis for EDRA LSWR
Check if farmacista33.it is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Farmacista33 is a specialized Italian healthcare media platform operated by EDRA LSWR, focusing on pharmacists and related healthcare professionals. The website provides clinical research insights, professional updates, training resources, and news relevant to the pharmacy sector. It holds a strong market position as a trusted source of information within the Italian healthcare media landscape. Technically, the site employs a modern technology stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and OneSignal for push notifications, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, cookie consent mechanisms, and no visible vulnerabilities, though improvements like CSP headers and a security.txt file are recommended. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR, though explicit contact information is not prominently displayed. Advertising and tracking are implemented responsibly with user consent. WHOIS data confirms legitimate registration consistent with the business identity, supporting high trustworthiness.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Farmacista33 operates as an important entity in the healthcare media sector, targeting pharmacists and healthcare professionals in Italy. Its business model revolves around content provision, professional education, and advertising revenue. The platform benefits from partnerships with related healthcare domains such as doctor33.it and odontoiatria33.it, enhancing its ecosystem. The company leverages digital marketing tools and social media to engage its audience. While the site lacks explicit terms of service and direct contact details, it maintains strong privacy and cookie policies, reflecting a mature compliance posture. The content is professionally curated, supporting the platform's credibility and market relevance.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and standard security headers present. The use of a consent management platform and Google Tag Manager's consent mode indicates attention to privacy compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and a security.txt file suggests room for improvement in transparency and vulnerability management. Accessibility features are basic, and further enhancements could improve compliance and user experience. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from formalizing security governance documentation.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement a Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate XSS and related attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
EDRA LSWR
Farmacista33 - EDRA LSWR dedica al mondo della Farmacista approfondimenti di clinica e ricerca, formazione, attualità professionale e news quotidiane
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Cookie consent mechanism implemented
- No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML
- Use of Google Tag Manager with consent mode
- No deprecated or vulnerable libraries detected in scripts
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a professional healthcare media platform focused on pharmacists in Italy.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 81 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM44 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled
MEDIUMDomain can be transferred without authorization
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
- •No domain protection locks enabled
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings