Skip to main content

Is fastcompany.social a Scam? Security Check Results - fastcompany.social Reviews

fastcompany.social favicon

Is fastcompany.social Safe? Security Analysis for Trending - Mastodon

Check if fastcompany.social is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Mastodon 4.4.3ReactJavaScript ES ModulesSVGCSS+1 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 2:12:12 AM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

fastcompany.social is an independent Mastodon social network instance focused on providing a decentralized, ad-free, and privacy-respecting platform for users to participate in the fediverse. The site emphasizes ethical design and user data ownership, positioning itself as a privacy-conscious alternative to mainstream social networks. The platform is built on Mastodon version 4.4.3, leveraging modern web technologies such as React and ES modules to deliver a responsive and accessible user experience. While the site demonstrates a basic level of content quality and technical implementation, it lacks comprehensive privacy compliance features such as cookie consent mechanisms and detailed terms of service. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected in the provided data. The absence of contact information and incident response policies limits transparency and user trust. Overall, the domain appears legitimate but privacy protected, which is typical for decentralized social network instances. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and user support information would enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

Mastodon 4.4.3ReactJavaScript ES ModulesSVGCSSWebSockets

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates as a small independent Mastodon server instance within the broader decentralized social networking ecosystem. Its market positioning is niche, targeting users seeking an ad-free and surveillance-free social media experience. The business model is community-driven and open source, relying on federation rather than centralized control. Key services include social networking and federated microblogging. The platform's partnership ecosystem includes Mastodon project resources and related open source communities. Growth indicators are not evident from the data, and no parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The lack of explicit business contact details and certifications suggests a grassroots or volunteer-run operation rather than a commercial enterprise.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is moderate. The site uses HTTPS (implied by the WebSocket secure URL), but no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries from the provided content. However, the absence of incident response contact channels and vulnerability disclosure policies indicates gaps in security governance and transparency. Compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations is minimal, with only a basic privacy policy present and no cookie consent mechanism. The security culture appears limited, likely reflecting the community-driven nature of the platform rather than a formal corporate security program.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Mastodon is a social network focused on no ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization. It allows users to own their data and participate in the fediverse.

Key Services:
social networkingfederated microblogging
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Mastodon 4.4.3ReactJavaScript ES ModulesSVGCSSWebSockets
Frameworks:
React
Platforms:
Mastodon
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by wss:// streaming API URL)

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:excellent

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a Mastodon social network instance with decentralized social networking focus.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

75/100
Score

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0"

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 44 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:94.23.75.107
Name Servers:
ns-1368.awsdns-43.orgDNS only
ns-1660.awsdns-15.co.ukDNS only
ns-198.awsdns-24.comDNS only
ns-649.awsdns-17.netDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:102ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Mastodon 4.4.3, utilizing React and modern JavaScript ES modules for frontend rendering. The use of SVG for logos and icons supports scalable graphics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate, with no explicit performance metrics available. The technical stack is modern but lacks some best practices in security headers and privacy compliance. There is no detected CMS beyond the Mastodon platform itself. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Opportunities exist to improve technical SEO, accessibility, and security configurations to reduce technical debt and enhance operational resilience.
Analyze Another Website