Skip to main content

Is favicon-generator.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Dan's Tools Reviews

favicon-generator.org favicon

Is favicon-generator.org Safe? Security Analysis for Dan's Tools

Check if favicon-generator.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
HTML5CSS3Bootstrap 3.4.1jQuery 2.2.4Font Awesome 4.0.3+3 more
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 5:07:31 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.favicon-generator.org is a specialized online tool offering favicon.ico and app icon generation services primarily targeting web developers and designers. It provides image conversion from PNG, JPG, and GIF formats to ICO files compatible with all major browsers, including legacy support for Internet Explorer. The site also features an icon gallery, an online favicon editor, and links to related web development utilities. The business operates under the brand Dan's Tools, with a small-scale, niche market presence focused on free utility tools monetized through advertising and affiliate marketing. Technically, the site employs a traditional web stack with Bootstrap 3.4.1, jQuery 2.2.4, Font Awesome 4.0.3, and Amazon Cloudfront CDN for hosting static assets. Google Analytics and Google Adsense are integrated for tracking and monetization. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure, though some libraries are outdated. Security headers are not explicitly present in the HTML content, and no cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating room for improvement in privacy compliance and security hardening. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS usage is implied but not explicitly confirmed in the HTML content. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities are evident, but the absence of security headers and modern privacy controls reduces the overall security score. WHOIS data is unavailable due to a malformed response, suggesting privacy protection or query issues. This limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy, though the website content and business information appear consistent and trustworthy. Overall, the site is a functional, niche utility with good content quality and business credibility but could benefit from enhanced security practices, updated technology stack, and improved privacy compliance to strengthen trust and user protection.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3Bootstrap 3.4.1jQuery 2.2.4Font Awesome 4.0.3Google AnalyticsGoogle AdsenseCloudfront CDN

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the technology sector, providing free online tools for favicon and app icon generation. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a simple, accessible service with additional features like an icon editor and gallery. Revenue streams include advertising via Google Adsense and affiliate marketing with SEMrush. The target customers are web developers, designers, and app developers needing icon assets. The company has maintained a consistent brand presence since at least 2014, with a small but focused user base. Partnerships with SEMrush and related web development sites enhance its ecosystem. The business model relies on free access with optional user accounts for premium features, indicating a freemium or ad-supported approach. Growth indicators are limited but stable, with no evident expansion into other markets or sectors.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is likely enabled, but no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or Strict-Transport-Security are detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The absence of a cookie consent banner and GDPR compliance indicators suggests gaps in privacy regulation adherence. No incident response or security policy information is provided, limiting transparency. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries could expose the site to known vulnerabilities if not regularly patched. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities are present in the HTML content. Overall, the security culture appears basic, with opportunities to enhance protection and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve defense against common attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Dan's Tools

Description:

Online tool to convert images (PNG, JPG, GIF) to favicon.ico and app icons for web and mobile platforms. Provides favicon editor, gallery, and related web development tools.

Key Services:
Favicon.ico generationApp icon generation for iOS and AndroidOnline favicon editorIcon gallery browsingRelated web dev tools (color codes, font stacks, converters)
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3Bootstrap 3.4.1jQuery 2.2.4Font Awesome 4.0.3Google AnalyticsGoogle AdsenseCloudfront CDN
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of HTTPS implied by origin-trial meta tags and Google Analytics

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Adsense
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website provides a specialized favicon and app icon generation service.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 85 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

84 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
16 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(104 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:34.202.133.59, 34.200.98.251
Name Servers:
ns-1137.awsdns-14.org
ns-1885.awsdns-43.co.uk
ns-242.awsdns-30.com
ns-973.awsdns-57.net
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:412ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a traditional web technology stack with Bootstrap 3.4.1 and jQuery 2.2.4, which are functional but outdated. Hosting is via Amazon Cloudfront CDN, improving content delivery performance. Google Analytics and Adsense are integrated for analytics and monetization. The site is mobile responsive with basic accessibility features but lacks advanced SEO optimization and modern security practices such as CSP headers. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external CDNs and scripts. Technical debt is present due to older libraries and missing security headers. Modernization opportunities include upgrading frameworks, implementing security best practices, and enhancing privacy compliance to reduce technical risks impacting business operations.
Analyze Another Website