Skip to main content

Is fdctimes.com a Scam? Security Check Results - fdctimes.com Reviews

F

Is fdctimes.com Safe? Security Analysis for Salud y Enfermedad

Check if fdctimes.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareN/asmall
HTMLCSS
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 5:51:54 AM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website 'Salud y Enfermedad' is a Spanish-language health information portal providing articles and educational content on a variety of health topics including alternative medicine, cancer, dental health, nutrition, and family health. The site targets Spanish-speaking individuals seeking general health knowledge. The business model appears to be content publishing without evident monetization or e-commerce features. The domain is registered since 2015 and hosted via Cloudflare, indicating a stable but basic technical infrastructure. The site uses simple HTML and CSS without advanced frameworks or CMS, resulting in basic mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is minimal with no DNSSEC, no security headers, and no visible privacy or cookie policies, which poses compliance and trust challenges. No contact or incident response information is provided, limiting user trust and security transparency. Overall, the site is functional but lacks modern security and privacy features.

Detected Technologies

HTMLCSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website occupies a niche in Spanish health content, likely competing with other health information portals. Its competitive advantage is language-specific content and a broad range of health topics. The absence of contact information and privacy policies may limit user trust and growth potential. The business model is informational, possibly ad-supported or affiliate-based, though no ads or tracking scripts were detected. The site links to multiple language-specific sister sites, indicating a networked content strategy. Growth indicators are limited due to lack of visible engagement or social media presence. Strategic partnerships appear limited to related language domains. Overall, the business operates as a small-scale health content provider with moderate market presence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is low. The site uses HTTPS (implied by Cloudflare hosting) but lacks DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are present, risking GDPR non-compliance. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided, reducing readiness for security incidents. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. The lack of contact information and security policies reduces trustworthiness. Recommendations include implementing DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response contacts to improve security posture and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Website providing health-related content in Spanish, covering topics such as alternative medicine, bites and stings, cancer, conditions and treatments, dental health, diet and nutrition, family health, healthcare industry, mental health, public health safety, surgeries and operations.

Key Services:
Health articlesMedical informationHealth education
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTMLCSS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, health

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

65/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 63 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:fdctimes.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/5/2025 (63 days)
SANs:fdctimes.com, *.fdctimes.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
9 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(370 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.35.121, 172.67.220.194
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3033::ac43:dcc2, 2606:4700:3030::6815:2379
Name Servers:
asa.ns.cloudflare.com
titan.ns.cloudflare.com
SOA:Serial: 2377384493, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:113ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with basic HTML and CSS without detectable modern frameworks or CMS. It is hosted behind Cloudflare, providing CDN and basic DDoS protection. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness. SEO is basic with canonical tags and meta viewport but lacks advanced SEO optimizations. Accessibility features are minimal. No JavaScript frameworks or analytics scripts were detected, indicating low technical complexity but also limited interactivity and tracking. The site would benefit from modernization including responsive design improvements, SEO enhancements, and security hardening.
Analyze Another Website