Skip to main content

Is fdroidstatus.org a Scam? Security Check Results - The F-Droid Team Reviews

fdroidstatus.org favicon

Is fdroidstatus.org Safe? Security Analysis for The F-Droid Team

Check if fdroidstatus.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
HTML5Bootstrap CSS
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 1:41:20 AM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

F-Droid Monitor is a specialized open source service focused on monitoring the build status of F-Droid applications and related buildserver processes. It serves a niche audience of developers and users within the F-Droid ecosystem by providing real-time status updates on app builds and website builds. The website is modest in scale and content, reflecting its targeted technical purpose rather than broad commercial ambitions. Technically, the website employs basic HTML5 and Bootstrap CSS for layout and styling, hosted likely via NameCheap services as indicated by WHOIS data. The site is functional with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. There is no evidence of a CMS or complex frameworks. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and privacy or cookie policies, which limits its compliance posture. The domain is privacy protected, which is common for small open source projects, and no WAF or blocking mechanisms are detected. The absence of contact information and incident response details reduces transparency and trustworthiness somewhat. Overall, the website is a functional, niche monitoring tool with moderate technical maturity and security posture. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and contact transparency would enhance trust and compliance. The domain registration is legitimate and appropriate for the business scale.

Detected Technologies

HTML5Bootstrap CSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

F-Droid Monitor operates within the open source software monitoring niche, supporting the F-Droid ecosystem. Its market position is that of a community-focused tool rather than a commercial enterprise. The business model is likely non-commercial or donation-supported, focusing on providing transparency and build status information. The target customers are developers and technically inclined users of F-Droid apps. The project is relatively new, founded in 2023, and maintains open source transparency with code hosted on GitLab. There are no evident partnerships or subsidiaries. The lack of commercial branding or marketing indicates a community-driven approach rather than aggressive growth or monetization.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website is basic. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security is a notable gap. The domain uses privacy protection, which is appropriate for the project type. No HTTPS configuration details were provided, but it is assumed HTTPS is enabled given modern web standards. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates limited compliance readiness. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing standard security best practices and improving transparency around data protection and incident handling.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

The F-Droid Team

Description:

F-Droid Monitor is a service that monitors the build status of F-Droid apps and related buildserver cycles. It provides status updates on app builds, website builds, and various build steps related to the F-Droid ecosystem.

Key Services:
Build status monitoringApp build status reportingWebsite build status reporting
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5Bootstrap CSS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a niche monitoring tool for F-Droid app builds.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

95/100
Score

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 52 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(696 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:37.218.245.231
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.com
dns2.registrar-servers.com
SOA:Serial: 1756698169, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:60ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a simple technical stack based on HTML5 and Bootstrap CSS, with no detected CMS or JavaScript frameworks. Hosting appears to be via NameCheap with standard DNS servers. The site is moderately performant with basic mobile responsiveness. There is room for improvement in SEO and accessibility features. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal data collection. The site is open source with versioning and source code links provided, supporting transparency. Technical risks are low but include lack of security headers and missing DNSSEC. Modernization opportunities include enhancing accessibility, SEO, and security configurations.
Analyze Another Website