Skip to main content

Is federfarmaco.it a Scam? Security Check Results - federfarmaco.it Reviews

F

Is federfarmaco.it Safe? Security Analysis for Waiting for the redirectiron...

Check if federfarmaco.it is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
JavaScript
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 4:40:31 PM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website federfarmaco.it is currently inaccessible beyond a security challenge page that performs browser integrity checks and automatic redirects, indicating the presence of a Web Application Firewall or similar security mechanism. The domain is well-established, created in 2002, and DNSSEC is enabled, which suggests a legitimate registration. However, the website content is minimal and outdated, with detected CMS versions Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, both of which are obsolete and pose significant security risks. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, nor is there any visible contact or business information. The external link to BitNinja.io suggests use of third-party security services to protect the site. Overall, the digital maturity and content quality are poor, limiting the ability to assess the business or security posture fully.

Detected Technologies

JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of accessible content and absence of business information on the site, it is not possible to determine the company's market positioning, business model, or target audience. The domain age indicates a long-standing presence, but the outdated CMS and lack of visible business data suggest limited recent investment in digital presence. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the content. The site appears to be protected by a security service, possibly to mitigate attacks or unauthorized access.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is mixed. On one hand, DNSSEC is enabled, which is a positive indicator for domain security. On the other hand, the use of outdated CMS versions with known vulnerabilities is a critical risk. The absence of visible security headers and lack of HTTPS enforcement details further reduce confidence. The presence of a security challenge page indicates proactive protection but also blocks content access, complicating security assessment. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, and no privacy or cookie compliance mechanisms are detected.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade the CMS platforms to supported, secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page shows a security challenge with automatic redirect and browser integrity checks, indicating a WAF or security protection blocking direct content access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScript
Frameworks:
Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100
Best Practices:
  • DNSSEC enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked behind a security challenge page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:151.8.21.23 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:musvc.com include:sendgrid.net -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@federfarmaco.it

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 60 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
22 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(234 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC ON
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:86.107.36.16
Name Servers:
ns1.register.itDNS only
ns2.register.itDNS only
MX Records:
0: federfarmaco-it.mail.protection.outlook.com
20: mx2.workup.it
SOA:Serial: 2023100205, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:121ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:151.8.21.23 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:musvc.com include:sendgrid.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses very outdated CMS technologies (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) which are no longer supported and expose the site to security risks. The HTML content is minimal and primarily serves as a security challenge page with JavaScript-based browser integrity checks and automatic redirects. No modern analytics, tracking, or marketing tools are detected. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic at best. DNSSEC is enabled, which is a positive technical security feature. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure appears legacy and in need of modernization.
Analyze Another Website