Skip to main content

Is federfarmaservizi.it a Scam? Security Check Results - federfarmaservizi.it Reviews

F

Is federfarmaservizi.it Safe? Security Analysis for 403 - Forbidden

Check if federfarmaservizi.it is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherItalysmall
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 4:40:19 PM
33
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website federfarmaservizi.it is currently inaccessible, presenting a 403 Forbidden error page that blocks access to any meaningful content. This prevents extraction of business, contact, or policy information. The domain is well-established, created in 2001, and registered without privacy protection, indicating legitimacy. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of security headers are minor security concerns. The technical infrastructure appears minimal with only Google Fonts loaded externally. No analytics, tracking, or marketing tools are detected. Overall, the site lacks visible content, policies, or contact details, resulting in a low digital maturity and poor user experience. Security posture is basic due to HTTPS presence but limited by missing headers and access restrictions.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the 403 Forbidden error, no direct business intelligence can be gathered from the website content. The domain age suggests a longstanding entity likely operating in Italy. No partner or subsidiary domains are identified. The absence of contact information, privacy policies, or terms of service limits assessment of business credibility and compliance. The site does not currently support user engagement or data collection, indicating either a restricted or under-maintenance status.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is limited by the lack of DNSSEC and absence of security headers in the HTML content. HTTPS is presumably enabled (inferred from URL scheme), but no advanced security mechanisms are visible. The 403 Forbidden error indicates access control is enforced, but it also blocks legitimate content access. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is available. The site does not expose sensitive data or forms, reducing attack surface but also limiting functionality. Overall, security maturity is low to moderate with room for improvement in DNS security and HTTP header configurations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website returns a 403 Forbidden error page indicating access is blocked or restricted. No WAF vendor branding detected but content is blocked.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx include:federfarmaservizi.it.spf.auto.dnssmarthost.net ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 44 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

50/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: ljfa2dlccfre22u5jtzhdjzue45l3e4apj42zxbak2plfby5zdla.mx-verification.google.com

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
24 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(85 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:35.214.197.6
Name Servers:
ns1.siteground.netDNS only
ns2.siteground.netDNS only
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
15: ljfa2dlccfre22u5jtzhdjzue45l3e4apj42zxbak2plfby5zdla.mx-verification.google.com
SOA:Serial: 105, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:116ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx include:federfarmaservizi.it.spf.auto.dnssmarthost.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

CRITICAL

Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves a static 403 Forbidden error page with minimal HTML and CSS. The only external resource loaded is Google Fonts. No JavaScript libraries, analytics, or CMS indicators are present. The site lacks meta tags for SEO and accessibility features. Mobile optimization is poor due to the error page nature. Hosting provider and platform details are not discernible from the content. The domain is old and stable but the website technical implementation is minimal and likely incomplete or restricted.
Analyze Another Website