Skip to main content

Is fengemail.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 深圳千刻网络科技有限公司 Reviews

fengemail.com favicon

Is fengemail.com Safe? Security Analysis for 深圳千刻网络科技有限公司

Check if fengemail.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyChinasmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptBootstrapjQuery+4 more
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 9:20:42 AM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

深圳千刻网络科技有限公司运营的蜂邮EDM邮件营销平台,专注于为企业提供专业的邮件群发解决方案。其产品线涵盖标准版、外贸版、企业版及定制版,支持邮箱列表管理、邮件可视化编辑、批量群发及数据统计分析,满足不同企业的邮件营销需求。网站内容丰富,面向中国及国际市场的企业用户,尤其是外贸和B2B领域。技术上采用现代前端框架和多种分析工具,具备良好的移动优化和SEO表现。安全方面,网站启用HTTPS,但缺少部分安全头和隐私合规机制。WHOIS信息缺失,存在一定信任风险。整体网站专业度高,适合目标客户使用。

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptBootstrapjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Facebook PixelBaidu Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

蜂邮EDM平台在邮件营销行业中定位为专业且多版本的邮件群发服务商,具备定制开发能力,支持大规模邮件发送和多IP轮播技术。其业务模式为SaaS结合定制开发,目标客户为需要高效邮件营销的企业,尤其是外贸B2B客户。网站展示了多个客户评价和丰富的产品功能,显示出一定的市场认可度和客户基础。合作伙伴和友情链接广泛,形成了较为完善的生态圈。缺乏公开的财务和成立年份信息,规模推测为小型企业。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

k*****@qianke.ltd

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站采用HTTPS保障数据传输安全,未发现明显的安全漏洞或敏感信息泄露。使用了Google Analytics、Facebook Pixel及百度统计等多种追踪工具,但未见明确的cookie同意机制,存在隐私合规风险。缺少安全策略、事件响应及漏洞披露信息,建议完善安全管理文档和联系方式。WHOIS信息缺失降低了域名的信任度,建议核实域名注册状态。整体安全成熟度中等,适合业务开展但需加强合规和安全透明度。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

完善网站安全头配置,增强防护能力。

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

深圳千刻网络科技有限公司

Description:

蜂邮EDM专业研发邮件发送软件及邮件营销平台解决方案,提供标准版、外贸版、企业版、定制版及SMTP接口服务。服务包括邮箱列表管理、邮件可视化制作、触发式邮件推送、主动群发及数据分析。

Key Services:
邮件群发平台EDM邮件营销系统邮箱列表管理邮件可视化编辑邮件批量群发邮件数据统计分析SMTP接口服务
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptBootstrapjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Facebook PixelBaidu Analytics
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of analytics and tracking scripts with async loading

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsBaidu AnalyticsFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelBaidu Analytics
Marketing Tools:
Facebook PixelBaidu Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 61 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(145 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:8.217.95.98
Name Servers:
carla.ns.cloudflare.com
plato.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: wmail.fengemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2378461528, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:82ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站基于现代前端技术栈构建,使用Bootstrap框架和多种JavaScript库,支持响应式设计和良好的用户体验。集成了多种第三方分析和营销工具,便于数据驱动的业务决策。页面结构清晰,SEO优化良好。性能表现中等,加载速度适中。缺少CMS信息,可能为定制开发。建议优化无障碍支持和进一步提升性能以增强用户体验。
Analyze Another Website