Skip to main content

Is feratel.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Feratel Media Technologies AG Reviews

feratel.com favicon

Is feratel.com Safe? Security Analysis for Feratel Media Technologies AG

Check if feratel.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyAustriamedium
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebotGoogle Publisher Tags (GPT)HTML5+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 7:28:04 AM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Feratel Media Technologies AG operates a professional website offering over 1,000 live webcams, flyingcams, and weather forecasts across Europe, targeting tourism and travel sectors. The company positions itself as a key European provider of real-time weather and webcam data services. The website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and employs modern web technologies including TYPO3 CMS, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. Advertising is managed through reputable networks such as Google and Meta Platforms with transparent user consent mechanisms. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though the absence of security headers and explicit incident response contacts are areas for improvement. The missing WHOIS domain registration data is a notable anomaly that reduces trust and requires verification. Overall, the website is professional, GDPR compliant, and safe for general audiences, with a moderate risk profile primarily due to domain registration opacity.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebotGoogle Publisher Tags (GPT)HTML5CSS3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Feratel's market positioning as a technology provider in the tourism and weather information sector is supported by its extensive live webcam network and weather data services. The business model likely includes B2B partnerships with tourism boards and B2C services for travelers. The company leverages advertising and analytics tools to monetize and optimize user engagement. The presence of Facebook domain verification and comprehensive cookie consent indicates a mature approach to privacy and marketing. However, the lack of visible contact details and security policies may limit customer trust and operational transparency. The domain registration inconsistency suggests a need for stronger corporate governance or domain management practices.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@feratel.at

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a baseline security maturity with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place, supporting GDPR compliance. The use of non-personalized ads by default and detailed cookie categorization reflects good privacy practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, and lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, indicate gaps in security hardening and transparency. No vulnerabilities or malware were detected in the content. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain ownership legitimacy, which could impact trust and security assurance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Feratel Media Technologies AG

Description:

Über 1.000 Live Webcams, Flyingcams & Wettervorhersagen aus ganz Europa. Jetzt Webcams entdecken und live ansehen!

Key Services:
Live webcamsFlyingcamsWeather forecastsWeather data services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebotGoogle Publisher Tags (GPT)HTML5CSS3
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Non-personalized ads requested

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdSenseGoogle DoubleClickMeta Platforms (Facebook Ads)
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Cookiebot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=16000000; includeSubDomains; preload;"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:193.41.136.0/22 ip4:83.175.122.102 ip4:217.175.202.129 ip4:217.175.206.164 ip4:109.70.102.195 include:spf.messagelabs.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.atlassian.net include:spf1.eyepinnews.com include:spf2.eyepinnews.com include:spf3.eyepinnews.com -all
DNS Lookups:8/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:mail(1512-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:193.41.139.184
Name Servers:
sec1.rcode0.netDNS only
sec2.rcode0.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: cluster8.eu.messagelabs.com
20: cluster8a.eu.messagelabs.com
SOA:Serial: 2025082000, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:81ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:193.41.136.0/22 ip4:83.175.122.102 ip4:217.175.202.129 ip4:217.175.206.164 ip4:109.70.102.195 include:spf.messagelabs.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.atlassian.net include:spf1.eyepinnews.com include:spf2.eyepinnews.com include:spf3.eyepinnews.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS and uses modern JavaScript libraries and Google services for analytics and advertising. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, providing granular user control. The site is mobile-optimized and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and hreflang attributes for multilingual support. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The absence of security headers and WHOIS data are technical risks that should be addressed to improve overall site security and trust.
Analyze Another Website