Skip to main content

Is fgwilson.com a Scam? Security Check Results - FG Wilson Reviews

fgwilson.com favicon

Is fgwilson.com Safe? Security Analysis for FG Wilson

Check if fgwilson.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyUnited Kingdomlarge
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerOneTrust Cookie ConsentAdobe Experience Manager (AEM) clientlibs
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 4:45:24 PM
72
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

FG Wilson is a globally recognized manufacturer and provider of diesel power generators, specializing in prime and backup power solutions. The company operates a professional website built on Adobe Experience Manager, showcasing a broad product range and supporting tools such as dealer locators and parts identification. The site targets industrial and commercial customers requiring reliable power generation equipment. Technically, the website employs modern technologies including Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for analytics and cookie consent, respectively. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit security policies or vulnerability disclosure information. WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy and consistency of the domain registration with the business claims. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence with room for improvement in published security and privacy documentation.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerOneTrust Cookie ConsentAdobe Experience Manager (AEM) clientlibs

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

FG Wilson holds a strong market position in the energy sector as a manufacturer of diesel generators. Their business model focuses on manufacturing, distribution, and after-sales support including genuine parts and control panels. The company appears to have partnerships with major industry players such as Caterpillar and Perkins, enhancing its competitive advantage. The website's structured product catalog and dealer locator indicate a well-developed sales and support ecosystem. The absence of direct contact information on the homepage suggests a focus on dealer-mediated customer interactions. The company targets industrial and commercial sectors requiring reliable power solutions, indicating a B2B business orientation.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented via OneTrust. However, it lacks visible security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for transparency and trust. Security headers are minimal, and no advanced security frameworks or certifications are published. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. The absence of a security.txt file or similar disclosure reduces the site's security maturity level. Overall, the site is secure for general browsing but could improve in transparency and formal security communication.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

FG Wilson

Description:

FG Wilson generators is a leading global provider and generator manufacturer of prime power and back up diesel power generators, built in modern facilities across the globe.

Key Services:
Diesel generators manufacturingGenerator control panelsGenuine parts supplyDealer locator services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerOneTrust Cookie ConsentAdobe Experience Manager (AEM) clientlibs
Frameworks:
Adobe Experience Manager
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website uses Adobe Experience Manager CMS.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age:31536000"

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

88/100
Score

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

10/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:198.180.154.8 ip4:205.220.170.179 ip4:205.220.182.179 ip4:165.26.50.28 ip4:165.26.50.27 ip4:165.26.50.23 ip4:165.26.50.24 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

10 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
29 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(279 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:184.51.237.176
AAAA Records:2a02:26f0:1c80:484::3215, 2a02:26f0:1c80:490::3215
Name Servers:
dns1.p03.nsone.net
dns2.p03.nsone.net
dns3.p03.nsone.net
dns4.p03.nsone.net
ns01.extcat.com
ns02.extcat.com
ns03.extcat.com
ns04.extcat.com
MX Records:
10: mxa-0004f803.gslb.pphosted.com
10: mxb-0004f803.gslb.pphosted.com
SOA:Serial: 1654191358, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:37ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:198.180.154.8 ip4:205.220.170.179 ip4:205.220.182.179 ip4:165.26.50.28 ip4:165.26.50.27 ip4:165.26.50.23 ip4:165.26.50.24 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS, indicating a mature technical infrastructure. It uses modern JavaScript libraries and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata and structured navigation. Performance appears moderate, with potential for optimization in loading speed. The technical stack supports scalability and content management but would benefit from enhanced security header implementation and explicit documentation of security and privacy practices.
Analyze Another Website