Skip to main content

Is fichtelgebirgsmuseum.de a Scam? Security Check Results - Fichtelgebirgsmuseum Reviews

F

Is fichtelgebirgsmuseum.de Safe? Security Analysis for Fichtelgebirgsmuseum

Check if fichtelgebirgsmuseum.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherGermanysmall
Bootstrap 5.3.3
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 2:13:34 AM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Fichtelgebirgsmuseum website represents a small cultural institution based in Germany, focusing on museum-related content. The site uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 and the CONTAILOR CMS platform, indicating a moderate level of technical infrastructure. The website is accessible without any WAF or security challenges, but it lacks critical compliance documents such as privacy and cookie policies. No contact information or social media presence is evident from the provided data, which limits user engagement and trust signals. Security posture is minimal with no detected security headers or incident response information, suggesting room for improvement in protecting user data and complying with GDPR requirements. Overall, the site is functional but basic, with moderate technical implementation and limited business credibility indicators.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 5.3.3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The museum operates in the cultural sector within Germany, targeting local visitors and museum enthusiasts. The business model appears to be informational and educational, with no evident e-commerce or transactional capabilities. The lack of detailed business information, contact details, and certifications limits the site's market positioning and trustworthiness. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, hosted via INWX, a known German registrar. The museum could benefit from enhancing its digital presence by adding comprehensive policies, contact channels, and SEO improvements to increase visibility and user trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

v*****@fichtelgebirgsmuseum.de

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture is basic, with HTTPS presumably enabled (not explicitly confirmed), but no security headers or advanced protections detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR, which is critical for websites operating in the EU. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which could hinder timely handling of security incidents. The site does not appear to use analytics or tracking scripts, reducing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response contacts to improve compliance and security maturity.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Fichtelgebirgsmuseum

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 5.3.3
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

60/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:bayern.de -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 87 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:146.75.123.52
Name Servers:
ns.inwx.de
ns2.inwx.de
ns3.inwx.eu
MX Records:
10: mail.bayern.de
SOA:Serial: 2024100700, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:70ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:bayern.de -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern Bootstrap 5.3.3 framework and is built on the CONTAILOR CMS platform, which suggests a moderate level of technical maturity. The site appears mobile-optimized and uses responsive design principles. However, SEO metadata is minimal, and no advanced frameworks or platforms beyond Bootstrap and CONTAILOR are detected. Hosting is via INWX, a reputable German provider. Performance is moderate based on the size and complexity of the HTML content. Accessibility features are basic, with no explicit ARIA roles or advanced accessibility markup detected. Technical debt appears low but could be improved by adding SEO and security enhancements.
Analyze Another Website