Skip to main content

Is figma.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Figma Reviews

figma.com favicon

Is figma.com Safe? Security Analysis for Figma

Check if figma.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Stateslarge
ReactNext.jsRive (animation)Google FontsVimeo API+1 more
Analyzed 9/4/2025Completed 7:48:48 PM
73
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Figma is a leading SaaS technology company specializing in collaborative interface design tools. Owned by Adobe, it serves designers, product teams, and developers worldwide with a platform that enables design, prototyping, and feedback gathering in a unified environment. The website reflects a mature digital presence with excellent content quality, professional branding, and clear business focus. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, integrates third-party services for fonts, video, and analytics, and demonstrates strong performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is robust, with HTTPS enforced, comprehensive security headers, and certifications like SOC 2 and ISO 27001. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant. WHOIS data is unavailable publicly, likely due to privacy protection, but this is consistent with the company's profile and does not detract from legitimacy. Overall, the website and business present a trustworthy, professional, and secure digital footprint.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsRive (animation)Google FontsVimeo APIYouTube API

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Figma operates in the technology sector with a SaaS subscription business model targeting design professionals and teams. It holds a strong market position as a leader in collaborative design tools, supported by Adobe's ownership. The company emphasizes security and compliance, as evidenced by certifications and published policies. Its ecosystem includes integrations with marketing and recruitment platforms. Revenue streams likely include tiered subscriptions and enterprise offerings. The website content and structure support a high level of professionalism and user engagement, indicating a mature and well-resourced operation.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

s*****@figma.com
a*****@figma.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Figma's security maturity is high, with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The site employs HTTPS, strict Content Security Policy, and other security headers. Certifications such as SOC 2 and ISO 27001 indicate formalized security management. Incident response contacts are provided, though a security.txt file is not detected. Privacy compliance is strong with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data is explained by privacy protection, common for large tech firms. Recommendations include publishing a security.txt file and DPO contact information to enhance transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Figma

Description:

Figma is the leading collaborative design platform for building meaningful products. Design, prototype, and build products faster—while gathering feedback all in one place.

Key Services:
Collaborative designPrototypingProduct feedback gathering
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsRive (animation)Google FontsVimeo APIYouTube API
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure cookies
  • No inline scripts without nonce or hash

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Statsig
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
statsigapi.netevents.statsigapi.net
Marketing Tools:
statsigapi.netadora-cdn.com
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

95/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a include:mktomail.com include:_spf.google.com ip4:149.72.216.165 ip4:167.89.79.69 ip4:167.89.87.53 ip4:168.245.25.177 ip4:167.89.97.206 include:mail.zendesk.com include:mg-spf.greenhouse.io -all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k1(1344-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
26 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(215 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:13.33.235.62, 13.33.235.61, 13.33.235.41, 13.33.235.23
Name Servers:
ns-1239.awsdns-26.org
ns-1657.awsdns-15.co.uk
ns-326.awsdns-40.com
ns-912.awsdns-50.net
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a include:mktomail.com include:_spf.google.com ip4:149.72.216.165 ip4:167.89.79.69 ip4:167.89.87.53 ip4:168.245.25.177 ip4:167.89.97.206 include:mail.zendesk.com include:mg-spf.greenhouse.io -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, ensuring fast performance and good SEO. It integrates external services for fonts, video playback, and analytics, all loaded asynchronously to optimize load times. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with semantic HTML and ARIA considerations. Security headers and HTTPS configuration are exemplary. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless CMS approach. Hosting provider details are not explicit but likely cloud-based given performance and scale. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a scalable, secure, and user-friendly experience.
Analyze Another Website