Skip to main content

Is fija.io a Scam? Security Check Results - Fija Finance Reviews

fija.io favicon

Is fija.io Safe? Security Analysis for Fija Finance

Check if fija.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/asmall
jQueryMooToolsFont AwesomeGoogle Fonts (Lexend)Contao Open Source CMS
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 10:28:04 PM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Fija Finance is a regulated DeFi platform focused on providing MiCA-compliant, transparent, and secure yield products without issuing its own token. The company targets crypto investors seeking easy access to advanced DeFi strategies with compliance and transparency. The website presents curated yield strategies with detailed APYs, safety scores, and blockchain/protocol information, positioning itself as a trustworthy player in the EU DeFi market. The platform emphasizes regulatory compliance, security audits, and automated risk management to build user trust. Technically, the website uses the Contao CMS with modern web technologies including jQuery, MooTools, Font Awesome, and Google Fonts. The site is mobile optimized, has good SEO practices, and integrates minimal user tracking via plausible.io analytics. The site is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected, and performance is moderate. However, some security headers are missing and no cookie consent mechanism is implemented. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, audited risk management, and transparent on-chain transactions. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the site lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. WHOIS data is unavailable due to TLD restrictions and privacy, but the website content and regulatory claims support legitimacy. Overall, Fija Finance demonstrates a professional and compliant approach to DeFi yield products with a solid technical foundation and good security practices. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response transparency would further enhance trust and resilience.

Detected Technologies

jQueryMooToolsFont AwesomeGoogle Fonts (Lexend)Contao Open Source CMS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Fija Finance operates in the competitive DeFi yield market with a focus on regulatory compliance under the EU MiCA framework. Its competitive advantage lies in offering curated, risk-assessed DeFi strategies with automated yield maximization and transparent on-chain operations. The business model likely generates revenue through fees on managed assets or yield performance. The target customers are crypto investors seeking compliant and easy-to-use DeFi products. The company has established partnerships with notable backers and media presence, indicating growth potential and market credibility. Founders have strong backgrounds in product management, legal compliance, blockchain technology, and operations, supporting a well-rounded leadership team. The platform's transparent safety scoring and audited risk management differentiate it from less regulated competitors.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The platform claims audited risk management and uses a Safety Score to assess DeFi strategy risks, indicating proactive security governance. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent gaps in transparency and defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, limiting external reporting channels. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by implementing additional headers, formalizing incident response, and enhancing privacy controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Fija Finance

Description:

A regulated, high-yield DeFi platform offering MiCA-compliant, transparent yield products without a tradable token.

Key Services:
Curated DeFi yield strategiesAutomated yield maximizationCompliance with MiCA regulationTransparent on-chain transactions
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryMooToolsFont AwesomeGoogle Fonts (Lexend)Contao Open Source CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of audited risk management
  • Safety Score for DeFi strategies

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
plausible.io
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
plausible.io
Marketing Tools:
plausible.io
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade, strict-origin-when-cross-origin"

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a ?all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:?all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 65 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Weak SPF Policy

HIGH

SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:85.13.166.59
Name Servers:
ns5.kasserver.comDNS only
ns6.kasserver.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
1: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2508131653, TTL: 7200s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:100ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a ?all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Contao Open Source CMS platform, leveraging jQuery and MooTools JavaScript libraries alongside Font Awesome icons and Google Fonts for styling. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data for enhanced search engine understanding. Analytics are implemented via plausible.io, a privacy-focused service. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. The site lacks advanced frameworks but maintains a clean and professional technical implementation. Opportunities exist to modernize JavaScript usage and improve accessibility features. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Analyze Another Website