Skip to main content

Is filecamp.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Filecamp Reviews

filecamp.com favicon

Is filecamp.com Safe? Security Analysis for Filecamp

https://filecamp.com

Check if filecamp.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
WordPressSlider RevolutionGoogle AnalyticsBing AdsMicrosoft Clarity+1 more
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 12:37:39 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Filecamp is a cloud-based Digital Asset Management (DAM) SaaS provider targeting marketing professionals and businesses that require centralized management of digital marketing assets such as images, videos, and brand guidelines. The company positions itself as an easy-to-use platform trusted by global clients including Coca-Cola, Unilever, and HBO. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with modern marketing and analytics tools integrated, indicating a solid technical infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policies and incident response information are absent. Privacy compliance is limited due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could be improved to meet GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, with clear business focus and good user experience.

Detected Technologies

WordPressSlider RevolutionGoogle AnalyticsBing AdsMicrosoft ClarityGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Filecamp operates in the technology sector providing DAM and media library solutions via a SaaS model. Its market positioning leverages ease of use and brand trust from notable clients. The business model focuses on subscription plans with unlimited users and features like online proofing and brand guidelines. The website content and client logos suggest a medium-sized company with a global reach. The absence of detailed contact information and privacy policies indicates areas for operational transparency improvement. The company maintains active social media channels, enhancing its marketing ecosystem. Growth indicators include a large user base and multiple country presence. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses asynchronous loading of analytics and marketing scripts, which is good practice. However, no security headers were detected in the provided data, and there is no public security policy or incident response contact information. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, which limits transparency for security researchers. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also suggests compliance gaps. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security and incident response policies, implementing security headers, and improving privacy compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Filecamp

Description:

Lightweight, cloud-based Digital Asset Management trusted by global clients like Coca-Cola, Unilever & HBO. Manage all your digital marketing assets with a sleek, user friendly cloud platform.

Key Services:
Digital Asset ManagementMedia Library SoftwareFile Sharing PlatformOnline Proofing & ApprovalBrand Asset ManagementOnline Brand Guidelines
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressSlider RevolutionGoogle AnalyticsBing AdsMicrosoft ClarityGoogle Tag Manager
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and analytics scripts asynchronously

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft Clarity
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Bing Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Microsoft ClarityBing Ads
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional SaaS platform for digital asset management.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a ip4:78.46.9.153/32 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:mail.zendesk.com ~all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-reports@filecamp.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:34.75.126.16
Name Servers:
ns-1197.awsdns-21.orgDNS only
ns-1626.awsdns-11.co.ukDNS only
ns-188.awsdns-23.comDNS only
ns-796.awsdns-35.netDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a ip4:78.46.9.153/32 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:mail.zendesk.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Slider Revolution plugin for rich media display. It integrates Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Bing Ads, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site uses modern fonts from Google Fonts and asynchronous script loading for performance. The design is responsive and mobile-optimized with good SEO meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is moderate with caching plugins indicated. There is no explicit hosting provider identified. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require regular security audits. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but meets basic standards.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about filecamp.com

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website