Skip to main content

Is finative.cloud a Scam? Security Check Results - finative.cloud Reviews

finative.cloud favicon

Is finative.cloud Safe? Security Analysis for Login

https://finative.cloud

Check if finative.cloud is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScript
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 3:05:35 AM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at app.finative.cloud is a login portal for a cloud-based service, likely SaaS, focused on user authentication. The site presents a minimal but functional login interface with language selection and password/email input fields. The business description and detailed company information are not publicly available on this page, limiting insights into market position or business model. The technical infrastructure uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with assets hosted on finative.cloud subdomains. The site is mobile optimized and shows moderate performance but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enforced and secure password input fields, but lacks visible security headers and formal security or privacy policies. No contact or incident response information is provided, and the domain uses WHOIS privacy protection, which is common for SaaS providers but reduces transparency. Overall, the site is functional for its purpose but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security disclosures.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to limited public content, detailed business intelligence is constrained. The site appears to serve a business or enterprise audience requiring secure login access, suggesting a B2B SaaS model. No explicit information about company size, sector, or partnerships is available. The branding is consistent with a professional cloud service provider. The absence of public policies or contact details may impact trust and user confidence. The domain's privacy-protected WHOIS record is typical for cloud services but limits external verification. No advertising or analytics integrations were detected, indicating a focus on core service delivery rather than marketing.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is moderate. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for login pages, and employs secure form inputs. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options that help mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a gap for enterprise-grade security readiness. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates incomplete compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No suspicious scripts or external domains were detected, reducing risk exposure. Overall, the site is secure enough for basic authentication but should improve transparency and security controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • Secure form with password input

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a login page for a SaaS or cloud-based service.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 88 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

50/100
Score

No Name Servers Found

HIGH

Unable to find name servers for domain

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(130 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:35.234.68.243
Name Servers:
ns.inwx.deWHOIS only
ns2.inwx.deWHOIS only
ns3.inwx.euWHOIS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2024100700, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:77ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a straightforward technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. Assets are served from finative.cloud subdomains, indicating a centralized hosting environment likely managed by the company or a cloud provider. The site is mobile responsive and loads a moderate number of scripts, including introjs for guided tours or onboarding. No CMS or third-party analytics frameworks were detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight platform. Performance is moderate with no obvious technical debt but could benefit from enhanced SEO metadata and accessibility improvements. The lack of security headers and compliance documentation represents a technical risk that should be addressed.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about finative.cloud

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website