Skip to main content

Is finchecker.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - Finchecker Reviews

finchecker.eu favicon

Is finchecker.eu Safe? Security Analysis for Finchecker

Check if finchecker.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceLatviasmall
jQuery 3.3.1Google Analytics (gtag.js)Google Tag ManagerCustom JavaScriptCSS3+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 1:01:55 AM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Finchecker is a Latvia-based company specializing in AML and KYC compliance solutions tailored for financial institutions and related sectors. Their offerings include AML screening, identity verification, transaction monitoring, and ongoing compliance monitoring, delivered via web and API platforms. The company positions itself as a flexible, all-in-one compliance provider with strong integration support and competitive pricing. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and relevant content for its target audience. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools, with HTTPS enforced and no visible security vulnerabilities. However, it lacks visible cookie consent mechanisms and published security policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the domain registration and website content are consistent and legitimate, supporting a high trust level.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.3.1Google Analytics (gtag.js)Google Tag ManagerCustom JavaScriptCSS3HTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Finchecker operates in the finance sector, targeting banks, investment firms, forex brokers, payment companies, insurance, and iGaming industries. Their business model is B2B SaaS, focusing on automating compliance processes through API and web solutions. The company leverages AI and machine learning for data aggregation and compliance automation. Market positioning emphasizes flexibility, comprehensive data coverage, and ease of integration. Partnerships include a development partner (g-2.eu). Growth indicators include active participation in industry events and a growing client base. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact channels and social media engagement.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@finchecker.eu

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712023****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. Use of secure forms with anti-bot hidden fields is noted. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security robustness. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could impact trust and compliance. Tracking scripts are present without a visible cookie consent banner, potentially impacting GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected in the website content or WHOIS data.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Finchecker

Description:

Finchecker offers a customizable AML Compliance solution that is advanced yet user-friendly. They provide web-based and API solutions for full automation of AML and KYC compliance processes.

Key Services:
AML screeningIdentity verificationID verificationTransaction monitoringPEP & Sanctions ScreeningOngoing MonitoringID/LivenessKYB (Know Your Business)Adverse Media Screening
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.3.1Google Analytics (gtag.js)Google Tag ManagerCustom JavaScriptCSS3HTML5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with anti-bot hidden field

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerLfeeder
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Lfeeder tracker
Marketing Tools:
Mailchimp (newsletter subscription)
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

65/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 43 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:finchecker.eu
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/12/2025 (43 days)
SANs:finchecker.eu, *.finchecker.eu

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:104.26.13.8, 104.26.12.8, 172.67.73.210
AAAA Records:2606:4700:20::681a:d08, 2606:4700:20::681a:c08, 2606:4700:20::ac43:49d2
Name Servers:
daniella.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
doug.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2377556769, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:135ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack including jQuery 3.3.1, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager, with custom JavaScript and CSS for styling. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags. Hosting details are not explicitly disclosed but the domain is registered via a reputable registrar. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. No CMS detected, indicating a custom or static site architecture. Technical risks include lack of security headers and missing cookie consent mechanisms. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security configurations to reduce technical debt and enhance user trust.
Analyze Another Website