Skip to main content

Is finsafe.pro a Scam? Security Check Results - finsafe.pro Reviews

F

Is finsafe.pro Safe? Security Analysis for 404 Not Found

Check if finsafe.pro is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
openresty/1.15.8.2
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 10:54:55 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website finsafe.pro is currently inaccessible, returning a 404 Not Found error page with no visible content or metadata. This prevents any meaningful analysis of the business, its services, or its technical infrastructure. The lack of accessible content and absence of contact or policy pages indicates the site is either inactive or misconfigured. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which limits the ability to verify registrant legitimacy or business claims. Technically, the site runs on openresty/1.15.8.2 but no further technology stack details are available. Security posture cannot be assessed due to missing HTTPS and security headers information. Overall, the site presents a high risk due to lack of transparency and accessibility.

Detected Technologies

openresty/1.15.8.2

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence can be derived from the website content as it is a 404 error page. No company name, description, services, or market positioning information is available. The domain's privacy-protected WHOIS data further obscures any business details. Without accessible content or contact information, the business credibility is very low.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is poor due to the absence of HTTPS confirmation, security headers, and any visible security or incident response policies. The site does not provide privacy or cookie policies, nor any contact channels for security incidents. The lack of accessible content also prevents evaluation of potential vulnerabilities or compliance gaps.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Restore website content to ensure accessibility and proper HTTP status codes.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
openresty/1.15.8.2
Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website returns a 404 Not Found error indicating no accessible content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15724800; includeSubDomains"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 32 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:finsafe.pro
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/2/2025 (32 days)
SANs:finsafe.pro, *.finsafe.pro

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Expires Soon

HIGH

Domain expires in 26 days

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
high(8 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.215.211, 104.21.53.174
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3034::ac43:d7d3, 2606:4700:3033::6815:35ae
Name Servers:
adele.ns.cloudflare.com
trace.ns.cloudflare.com
SOA:Serial: 2376784428, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:88ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves only a 404 error page via openresty/1.15.8.2 with no additional scripts, metadata, or content. No CMS or frameworks are detected. The lack of content and metadata indicates a lack of technical maintenance or misconfiguration. Performance and SEO are negatively impacted by the missing content. Mobile optimization and accessibility cannot be assessed but are presumed poor given the minimal content.
Analyze Another Website