Skip to main content

Is finsightvc.com a Scam? Security Check Results - FinSight Ventures Reviews

finsightvc.com favicon

Is finsightvc.com Safe? Security Analysis for FinSight Ventures

Check if finsightvc.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statesmedium
WebflowGoogle FontsjQuery 3.5.1
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 6:12:39 AM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

FinSight Ventures is a well-established multi-stage venture capital firm founded in 2004, managing a $600 million fund focused on technology investments globally, with offices in the US and Russia. The firm emphasizes long-term partnerships with visionary founders and supports companies through capital, hiring, and infrastructure. Their portfolio includes notable technology companies across the United States, India, and other regions. Technically, the website is built on Webflow with modern web standards, delivering a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and visible privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a concern but does not outweigh the professional presentation and business legitimacy indicated by the portfolio and press coverage. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in the venture capital market.

Detected Technologies

WebflowGoogle FontsjQuery 3.5.1

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

FinSight Ventures operates in the technology and finance sectors as a venture capital firm with a medium-sized fund. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-term partnership approach and focus on emerging technologies such as generative AI and superapps. The business model centers on investing capital and providing operational support to startups. Their target customers are startups and entrepreneurs seeking growth capital and strategic support. The firm has a strong partnership ecosystem evidenced by their portfolio companies and press mentions. Growth indicators include recent investments and active portfolio management. The company maintains a consistent brand and professional online presence, supporting its market position.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present, which could hinder timely handling of security incidents. Overall, the security culture appears nascent and would benefit from formalized policies and technical enhancements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

FinSight Ventures

Description:

FinSight Ventures is a $600 million multi-stage venture capital firm founded in 2004 by Alexey Garyunov. The firm focuses on partnering with visionary founders and helping companies grow through capital, hiring, and infrastructure support. Their 2025 focus includes generative AI breakthroughs, country-leading superapps worldwide, and emerging GPs with tech roots redefining venture capital.

Key Services:
Capital investmentHiring supportInfrastructure support
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WebflowGoogle FontsjQuery 3.5.1
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Twitter, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

44/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 66 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

HSTS Missing includeSubDomains

LOW

HSTS header does not include subdomains

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(274 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:99.83.190.102, 75.2.70.75
Name Servers:
ns57.domaincontrol.com
ns58.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2025061801, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:159ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Fonts and jQuery 3.5.1. Hosting is provided via Webflow's CDN, ensuring reliable delivery and moderate performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph metadata. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility compliance and security header implementation. No forms or data collection mechanisms were detected, reducing complexity but also limiting user engagement options. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Analyze Another Website