Skip to main content

Is firewallx.io a Scam? Security Check Results - FireWall.X Reviews

firewallx.io favicon

Is firewallx.io Safe? Security Analysis for FireWall.X

Check if firewallx.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statessmall
jQuery 2.2.3Swiper 3.4.0HTML5CSS3
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 10:00:14 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

FireWall.X is a specialized blockchain security product focused on providing smart contract firewall protection for EOSIO-based decentralized applications. Incubated and contributed by SlowMist Technology, it positions itself as a pioneering solution in the blockchain security niche. The website content is primarily in Chinese with an English version available, targeting blockchain developers and project operators. The business model revolves around security technology research and service provision for DApp security. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies such as jQuery and Swiper, hosted likely via GoDaddy, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture shows room for improvement, with no DNSSEC, no visible security headers, and no published security or incident response policies. The domain is privacy protected but registered with a reputable registrar and has an appropriate age for the business history. Overall, the website is functional and professional but lacks comprehensive privacy and security disclosures.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 2.2.3Swiper 3.4.0HTML5CSS3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

FireWall.X operates in the blockchain security sector, focusing on EOSIO smart contract protection. Its competitive advantage lies in being the first global smart contract firewall for EOSIO, supported by SlowMist's reputation. The business model is service and technology provision for blockchain security, targeting DApp developers and operators. Partnerships with multiple blockchain ecosystem players enhance its market presence. The company is small-sized, founded in 2018, with a clear focus on blockchain security research and protection. The website content and partner ecosystem indicate a credible and niche-focused operation with moderate growth potential.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is moderate but incomplete. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers reduces domain and web application security. No HTTPS enforcement details were found, and no incident response or security contact information is published, which limits transparency and readiness. The use of domain privacy protection is justified but geographic mismatch between registrant and business location is noted. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. Compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations is not evident due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture requires enhancements in domain security, web security headers, and transparency to improve trust and resilience.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

FireWall.X

Description:

FireWall.X is a blockchain security technology research product focused on providing smart contract firewall protection for EOSIO-based decentralized applications (DApps). It is incubated and contributed by SlowMist Technology, specializing in blockchain threat intelligence and security.

Key Services:
Smart contract firewall protectionDApp security defenseBlockchain threat intelligence research
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 2.2.3Swiper 3.4.0HTML5CSS3
Platforms:
EOSIO blockchain
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, health

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 82 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(449 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:185.199.108.153, 185.199.110.153, 185.199.109.153
Name Servers:
ns07.domaincontrol.com
ns08.domaincontrol.com
SOA:Serial: 2022120504, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:113ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a simple but effective technology stack including jQuery 2.2.3 and Swiper 3.4.0 for UI components. The HTML and CSS are valid and the site is moderately performant with basic mobile responsiveness. Hosting is likely via GoDaddy based on WHOIS data. There is no CMS detected, indicating a custom or static site. No advanced SEO or accessibility features are evident beyond basic meta tags. The site lacks modern security features such as DNSSEC and security headers, which are technical risks. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal data collection. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Analyze Another Website