Is firstplace.com Safe? Security Analysis for First Place Internet, Inc.
Check if firstplace.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
First Place Internet, Inc. operates the website www.firstplace.com, which serves as a search engine and internet navigation portal branded as 'First Place®'. The company claims a long history dating back to 1995, positioning itself as a niche player in the search engine market. The website offers basic search functionality powered by Google Custom Search and uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site design is functional but basic, with limited modern features and minimal mobile optimization. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS confirmation in provided data, absence of security headers, and no visible cookie consent mechanism. The WHOIS data is missing or indicates the domain is unregistered, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site is accessible and safe for general audiences but lacks advanced security and privacy compliance features.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The business operates in the technology sector focusing on internet search services. Its business model appears to be advertising-supported search functionality. The company targets general internet users seeking search and navigation services. Market positioning is modest, with no evident partnerships or subsidiaries. The website content and branding are consistent but basic, reflecting a small-sized company. Revenue streams likely come from advertising and search partnerships. The absence of contact information and limited privacy compliance may hinder user trust and growth potential. The company maintains trademark claims and copyright notices, indicating some level of brand protection.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website's security maturity is low to moderate. Key vulnerabilities include missing WHOIS registration data, lack of HTTPS confirmation, absence of security headers, and no cookie consent or privacy compliance mechanisms. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The use of third-party Google scripts introduces moderate tracking but no visible mitigation or transparency measures. The site does not expose sensitive data or forms collecting personal information beyond search queries. Overall, the security posture requires significant improvements to meet modern standards and regulatory compliance.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and verify configuration.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
First Place Internet, Inc.
First Place Internet, Inc. operates a search-related website branded as 'First Place®' offering search services and internet navigation.
basic
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
basic
basic
basic
Security Assessment
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is accessible with full content and no WAF blocking
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 70 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings