Skip to main content

Is fischer-cz.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - fischer Reviews

fischer-cz.cz favicon

Is fischer-cz.cz Safe? Security Analysis for fischer

Check if fischer-cz.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingCzech Republiclarge
JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebotAdform tracking+1 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 12:20:17 PM
72
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.fischer-cz.cz represents a large manufacturing company specializing in fixing systems such as plastic anchors, steel and chemical anchors. The company targets DIY enthusiasts, craftsmen, and construction professionals, positioning itself as a reliable and qualified partner in the industry. The site is built on the Sitecore CMS platform and employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance and tracking. The website demonstrates good content quality, professional design, and clear navigation, with mobile optimization and cookie consent mechanisms in place. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protection cookies, though the absence of security headers is noted as an area for improvement. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trustworthiness, but the website content and structure indicate a legitimate and professional business presence. Overall, the site scores well in content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebotAdform trackingSitecore CMS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Fischer operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on fixing systems for construction and DIY markets. The business model includes product manufacturing, online sales, and technical support services. The company maintains a strong market position with recognized brand reliability and innovation in product offerings. The website supports customer engagement through product catalogs, technical consulting, and digital tools like the fischer DIY app. Advertising and retargeting are managed via established networks such as Google and Facebook, with transparent cookie consent. The absence of explicit contact details on the homepage suggests a focus on digital self-service and dealer networks. The company appears to have a mature digital presence with room for enhanced direct customer contact channels.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookies to manage user sessions and consent, including CSRF protection tokens. It integrates third-party analytics and advertising scripts responsibly with user consent. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a security gap that could be exploited. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site complies with GDPR through a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, indicating potential areas for transparency improvement. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by implementing recommended HTTP security headers and publishing security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

fischer

Description:

Manufacturer and supplier of fixing systems including plastic anchors, steel and chemical anchors, serving DIY enthusiasts, craftsmen, and construction professionals worldwide.

Key Services:
Manufacturing of fixing systemsTechnical consultingOnline product catalogSupport and tools for installation
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebotAdform trackingSitecore CMS
Frameworks:
Sitecore
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • CSRF protection cookie (__RequestVerificationToken)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
AdformGoogle AdSenseFacebook Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelAdform Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Cookiebot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

100/100
Score
No issues found

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:185.66.36.83 ip4:194.127.209.204 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.smartemailing.cz -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_agg@vali.email
Forensic Reports:dmarc_agg@vali.email

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
18 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:20.73.186.195
Name Servers:
ns.do-ex.com
ns.do-ex.net
ns.ugfischer.com
ns2.ugfischer.com
MX Records:
10: fischercz-cz01i.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2018022599, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:68ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:185.66.36.83 ip4:194.127.209.204 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.smartemailing.cz -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Sitecore CMS platform, leveraging modern JavaScript frameworks and modules. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, along with Adform and Facebook for advertising and retargeting. Cookiebot manages cookie consent with granular user controls. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and layouts. Performance appears moderate with preloading of fonts and scripts. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No hosting provider details were found. The technical stack is modern and well-integrated but would benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements.
Analyze Another Website