Is flagcounter.com Safe? Security Analysis for Boardhost.com, Inc.
Check if flagcounter.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Flag Counter is a niche technology service operated by Boardhost.com, Inc., providing free website visitor counters that display flags representing visitor countries. The service targets website owners and bloggers who want to visualize visitor geography easily. The website is modest but functional, offering customization options and optional registration for enhanced features. The technical infrastructure includes JavaScript, jQuery, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security, hosted by Boardhost.com. The site uses HTTPS and has a stable domain registered since 2008, indicating maturity and legitimacy. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the security posture is moderate with good basic protections but room for enhancement.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The business operates in the technology sector, focusing on providing free visitor analytics tools with a simple business model relying on free usage and optional registration. The market position is niche with limited direct competition in free flag counters. Revenue streams are not explicit but may include advertising or premium features. The target customers are small website owners and bloggers globally. The company is small-sized, founded in 2008, and owned by Boardhost.com, Inc. The partnership ecosystem includes Boardhost.com as the parent company. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, with trust signals such as testimonials and privacy policy links.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting form submissions. However, it lacks DNSSEC, security headers like Content-Security-Policy, and explicit security or incident response policies. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. Data protection officer contact is not provided. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms despite tracking scripts indicates partial GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved to meet higher compliance and protection standards.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Boardhost.com, Inc.
Flag Counter provides free website visitor counters that display flags from visitors' countries, allowing website owners to track and visualize visitor geography.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
basic
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Use of Google reCAPTCHA for form submission
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website offers a free service for website visitor counters with geographic flag visualization.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
No email authentication configured
CRITICALDomain is vulnerable to email spoofing
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 60 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings