Skip to main content

Is fleek.xyz a Scam? Security Check Results - fleek.xyz Reviews

fleek.xyz favicon

Is fleek.xyz Safe? Security Analysis for Fleek | Monetize AI Characters & Twins

Check if fleek.xyz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
JavaScriptFramer (Framer Motion)Web Fonts (Inter, Fragment Mono, Nunito)Plausible Analytics
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 4:53:29 PM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Fleek.xyz is a technology startup platform focused on enabling users to create, launch, and monetize AI characters and digital twins that interact on social media. The platform targets social AI creators and content creators seeking to automate fanbase growth and engagement. The website is currently a landing page with a 'Coming Soon' message and a waitlist sign-up, indicating early-stage development or pre-launch status. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including the Framer framework and web fonts, with analytics powered by Plausible. The site is mobile-optimized with basic accessibility and SEO features but lacks comprehensive content and navigation. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Business credibility is moderate but limited by lack of contact information and formal policies. Overall, the site is professionally designed but minimal in content and compliance documentation.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptFramer (Framer Motion)Web Fonts (Inter, Fragment Mono, Nunito)Plausible Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Fleek.xyz positions itself in the emerging AI-driven social content creation market, offering a SaaS model for monetizing AI characters and digital twins. Its target customers are social media creators and AI enthusiasts. The platform aims to differentiate by automating content posting and fanbase growth. The presence of over 51k waitlist subscribers and logos of industry leaders suggests early traction and trust signals. However, the lack of detailed business information, contact data, and formal policies limits transparency. The business model likely includes subscription or transaction fees for platform usage. Partnerships or payment processors are not explicitly identified in the data. Growth indicators include waitlist size and branding consistency.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses minimal third-party scripts, reducing attack surface. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others that enhance protection against common web attacks. No forms with sensitive inputs were detected, minimizing immediate risk of data leakage. Absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs indicates immature security governance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. Overall, security maturity is moderate but could be improved by implementing best practices and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with user consent mechanisms to improve privacy compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Create, launch, and monetize AI Characters & Twins that post, reply, and grow your fanbase 24/7. The new Fleek turns anyone into a social AI creator.

Key Services:
Create AI charactersLaunch AI charactersMonetize AI charactersManage digital twinsGrow fanbase automatically
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptFramer (Framer Motion)Web Fonts (Inter, Fragment Mono, Nunito)Plausible Analytics
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Plausible Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Plausible Analytics
Marketing Tools:
Plausible Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a landing page with 'Coming Soon' message and waitlist sign-up

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:mailgun.org include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:d93f0f98@dmarc.mailgun.org
Forensic Reports:d93f0f98@dmarc.mailgun.org

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 83 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:fleek.xyz
Issuer:E8
Valid Until:11/28/2025 (83 days)
SANs:fleek.xyz

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
4 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(2240 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.69.115, 104.26.6.44, 104.26.7.44
AAAA Records:2606:4700:20::ac43:4573, 2606:4700:20::681a:72c, 2606:4700:20::681a:62c
Name Servers:
rihana.ns.cloudflare.com
scott.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:mailgun.org include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using the Framer framework, leveraging modern web fonts and JavaScript for animations and UI. It includes Plausible Analytics for privacy-focused user tracking. The site is responsive and mobile-optimized with a clean design. However, the content is minimal, primarily a landing page with a waitlist call to action. No CMS or backend technologies are explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not available. Performance is moderate given the lightweight content and minimal external dependencies. Technical debt appears low but the site lacks comprehensive SEO and accessibility features. Opportunities exist to improve metadata, structured data, and technical SEO for better search engine visibility.
Analyze Another Website