Skip to main content

Is flightcenterplus.de a Scam? Security Check Results - FlightCenterPlus Reviews

flightcenterplus.de favicon

Is flightcenterplus.de Safe? Security Analysis for FlightCenterPlus

https://flightcenterplus.de

Check if flightcenterplus.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationGermanysmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptCustom JS scriptsREST-API
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 8:27:21 AM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

FlightCenterPlus is a specialized software provider offering a comprehensive flight club and aviation sports management platform primarily targeting German-speaking aviation clubs, flight schools, and individual pilots. The platform includes modules for member management, aircraft tracking, flight logging, maintenance, financial administration, training, and reporting. The business model is subscription-based with flexible monthly terms and no minimum contract duration, positioning it as a niche but professional player in the aviation software market in Germany. Technically, the website is built with standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, with custom scripts supporting functionality such as smooth scrolling and login features. Hosting is managed via GoDaddy's domain control services, and the site shows moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or modern web frameworks. SEO and accessibility are basic but adequate for the target audience. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (assumed but not explicitly confirmed in provided data) and implements some security best practices in the login form, such as password visibility toggling and cryptographic salts. However, the absence of security headers, anti-CSRF tokens, and published security or incident response policies indicates room for improvement. Privacy compliance is partially met with a privacy policy present, but no cookie consent mechanism is detected. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy with clear contact information and relevant content for its niche. The security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with standard web security headers and policies. The risk level is low to moderate, with recommendations focusing on improving security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response transparency.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptCustom JS scriptsREST-API

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

FlightCenterPlus operates in a specialized segment of the transportation industry, focusing on aviation club and flight management software. Its competitive advantage lies in a comprehensive feature set tailored to flight clubs and aviation sports organizations, including license management, maintenance, and financial modules. The business model is SaaS with monthly subscriptions and no minimum contract term, appealing to small and medium-sized aviation clubs. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem with related aviation software providers such as Vereinsflieger.de and B4Takeoff.net, enhancing its service offering. Growth indicators include continuous product development and hosting assurances. The target customer segment is German-speaking aviation clubs and pilots, with a small company size and localized market presence.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@flightcenterplus.de

Phone Numbers (2)

+4953515******
+4917267*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and employs some security measures in form handling, but lacks critical HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. There is no visible anti-CSRF protection in forms, and no published security or incident response policies. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via a privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing. No vulnerabilities such as exposed credentials or outdated libraries were detected in the provided data. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly documented. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small SaaS provider but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

FlightCenterPlus

Description:

FlightCenterPlus is a software solution focused on flight logging, member management, and operational management for flight clubs and aviation sports organizations.

Key Services:
Person managementAircraft managementReservation systemFlight loggingMaintenance managementFinancial administrationTraining moduleReportingDocument managementCalendar and event management
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptCustom JS scriptsREST-API
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • Password input with toggle visibility
  • Hidden fields with salts and cryptographic placeholders in login form
  • JavaScript required for protected area

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

33/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a include:ispgateway.de -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:92.204.37.117
AAAA Records:2a00:116a:10a:72f0::
Name Servers:
ns81.domaincontrol.com
ns82.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
100: mxlb.ispgateway.de
SOA:Serial: 2025042700, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:64ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a include:ispgateway.de -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a custom technology stack using HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript with no detected CMS or major frameworks. The presence of custom scripts for UI enhancements and REST-API integration indicates moderate technical maturity. Hosting is via GoDaddy's domain control services, suggesting standard shared or dedicated hosting. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization but basic accessibility and SEO features. There is an opportunity to modernize the stack by adopting frameworks that improve maintainability and accessibility. Security technical debt includes missing security headers and lack of anti-CSRF protections. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about flightcenterplus.de

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website