Skip to main content

Is flock.io a Scam? Security Check Results - FLock Reviews

flock.io favicon

Is flock.io Safe? Security Analysis for FLock

Check if flock.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
ReactNext.jsAnt DesignJavaScript
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 5:08:59 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

FLock.io is a technology-focused platform aiming to provide decentralized, privacy-preserving solutions for artificial intelligence through federated machine learning integrated with blockchain technology. The website presents a professional and modern interface targeting developers, AI researchers, and enterprises interested in advanced AI training and deployment. The platform offers live AI models and training capabilities, positioning itself as a niche player in decentralized AI innovation. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, with UI components from Ant Design. Hosting includes Supabase for media content. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with good SEO practices. However, accessibility features are basic, and some security best practices like security headers are missing. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection, which is common but reduces transparency. No contact or incident response information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better transparency and policy disclosures. The overall risk assessment suggests a legitimate technology project with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, publishing contact and incident response details, and improving WHOIS transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsAnt DesignJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

FLock.io operates in the emerging field of decentralized AI and federated learning, leveraging blockchain technology to enhance privacy and security. Its business model focuses on providing a platform for AI model training and deployment without centralized data sharing, appealing to privacy-conscious organizations and developers. The presence of live models and training portals indicates active service offerings. The company targets a specialized market segment with technical expertise, positioning itself as an innovator in privacy-preserving AI. The lack of detailed company information and public WHOIS data suggests a small or startup entity focused on technology development rather than broad commercial presence. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

h*****@flock.io

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level of FLock.io is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis, but the lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact channels for security issues. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file limits transparency and trust. Overall, while the platform shows awareness of security basics, it requires enhancements in policy disclosures, header implementation, and incident response mechanisms to reach higher maturity.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

FLock

Description:

FLock.io aims to build a decentralised privacy-preserving solution for Artificial Intelligence.

Key Services:
Federated machine learning platformBlockchain integration for AILive AI models hostingTraining AI models on platform
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsAnt DesignJavaScript
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy: quarantine
Aggregate Reports:hello@flock.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 72 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: jba7e6kyenne6vj3hctstlrbzwh7kczb6sth6ff6raeektbx5i3q.mx-verification.google.com

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
8 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1043 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
ns-1047.awsdns-02.org
ns-1607.awsdns-08.co.uk
ns-292.awsdns-36.com
ns-823.awsdns-38.net
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
15: jba7e6kyenne6vj3hctstlrbzwh7kczb6sth6ff6raeektbx5i3q.mx-verification.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:223ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Next.js and React, with UI components from Ant Design, indicating a contemporary and maintainable codebase. Hosting includes Supabase for video content delivery, suggesting use of cloud services for scalability. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The site lacks some security best practices such as security headers and explicit privacy-related pages. Technical debt appears low given the modern frameworks, but the absence of certain compliance and security features represents an area for modernization and risk mitigation.
Analyze Another Website