Skip to main content

Is floorplan.live a Scam? Security Check Results - floorplan.live Reviews

floorplan.live favicon

Is floorplan.live Safe? Security Analysis for FLOORPLANLIVE

https://floorplan.live

Check if floorplan.live is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
AngularJS (ng-app, ng-scope)Bootstrap (themes and toggle/switch plugins)jQuery (implied by Bootstrap dependencies)Font Awesome 4.7.0Summernote WYSIWYG editor+1 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 8:27:05 AM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Floorplan.live provides an online SaaS platform focused on 2D floor plan editing and visualization, targeting professionals such as architects, real estate agents, and interior designers. The website uses a modern but somewhat dated AngularJS framework combined with Bootstrap for UI styling. The platform includes interactive floor plan editing tools accessible via a dashboard interface. The technical infrastructure is moderate in performance with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is average with cookie consent implemented but lacking visible security headers and privacy/legal policies. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, limiting transparency but not indicating suspicious activity. Overall, the website is functional but would benefit from enhanced security practices and clearer business and privacy disclosures.

Detected Technologies

AngularJS (ng-app, ng-scope)Bootstrap (themes and toggle/switch plugins)jQuery (implied by Bootstrap dependencies)Font Awesome 4.7.0Summernote WYSIWYG editorCookiescript for cookie consent

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the technology sector providing niche SaaS solutions for floor plan creation and editing. Its market positioning appears focused on professionals needing interactive floor plan tools. The business model is subscription or usage-based SaaS, though pricing and revenue details are not disclosed. The lack of visible contact or legal information limits trust signals. The company likely targets small to medium-sized professional users in architecture and real estate. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. Growth potential depends on improving transparency and expanding service offerings.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is basic with cookie consent implemented but no detected security headers or incident response contacts. The absence of privacy and terms of service pages is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The use of AngularJS may pose some risks if not regularly updated. Incident response readiness and data protection officer information are not disclosed, indicating room for improvement in security culture and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Online platform providing floor plan editing and live 2D floor plan creation tools.

Key Services:
2D floor plan editorfloor plan dashboardinteractive floor plan tools
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
AngularJS (ng-app, ng-scope)Bootstrap (themes and toggle/switch plugins)jQuery (implied by Bootstrap dependencies)Font Awesome 4.7.0Summernote WYSIWYG editorCookiescript for cookie consent
Frameworks:
AngularJSBootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Cookiescript
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

DMARC Partial Enforcement

LOW

DMARC only applies to 10% of messages

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:5.57.60.30 ip4:5.57.60.29 a mx include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine(10% enforcement)
Aggregate Reports:hello@floorplan.live
Forensic Reports:hello@floorplan.live

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:5.57.60.30
Name Servers:
ns10.dnsmadeeasy.comDNS only
ns11.dnsmadeeasy.comDNS only
ns12.dnsmadeeasy.comDNS only
ns13.dnsmadeeasy.comDNS only
ns14.dnsmadeeasy.comDNS only
ns15.dnsmadeeasy.comDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2009010185, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:73ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:5.57.60.30 ip4:5.57.60.29 a mx include:_spf.google.com -all

⚡Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses AngularJS and Bootstrap with additional libraries like Summernote and Font Awesome. The codebase shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiescript. No analytics or tracking services were detected in the provided content. The technical debt includes reliance on older AngularJS framework and missing security headers. Opportunities exist to improve performance, accessibility, and security configurations.
Analyze Another Website