Skip to main content

Is floss.social a Scam? Security Check Results - FLOSS.social Reviews

floss.social favicon

Is floss.social Safe? Security Analysis for FLOSS.social

Check if floss.social is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
MastodonTangerineUIJavaScriptReactRuby on Rails (implied by Mastodon)+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 1:42:18 AM
71
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

FLOSS.social is a niche Mastodon instance launched in 2018, dedicated to the Free, Libre, and Open Source Software (FLOSS) community. It provides a decentralized social media platform that encourages open discussion primarily in English, supported by a clear community code of conduct and a supporter program via Liberapay. The platform is hosted on infrastructure provided by Masto.Host, OVH, BunnyCDN, and SparkPost, and uses a customized TangerineUI interface. The website is professionally designed, well-structured, and offers a positive user experience with good mobile optimization and accessibility. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including Mastodon software, React, and JavaScript frameworks. Hosting and content delivery are managed by reputable providers, ensuring moderate to good performance. However, some improvements could be made in privacy compliance, such as implementing a cookie consent mechanism and publishing a formal security policy. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, but security headers could be enhanced and a vulnerability disclosure policy added. Overall, FLOSS.social demonstrates a mature security posture for a community-driven platform, with clear moderation and enforcement policies. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical and justified for this type of service. No suspicious or malicious indicators were found. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance, publishing security documentation, and improving security headers to further strengthen trust and compliance. This analysis concludes that FLOSS.social is a trustworthy, well-managed community platform with a strong focus on FLOSS values and user safety, suitable for its target audience and aligned with best practices in security and privacy.

Detected Technologies

MastodonTangerineUIJavaScriptReactRuby on Rails (implied by Mastodon)Liberapay (support platform)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

FLOSS.social occupies a specialized market niche as a Mastodon instance focused on the FLOSS community, leveraging the growing interest in decentralized social media. Its business model is community-supported, relying on donations through Liberapay, which aligns with its open-source ethos. The platform benefits from partnerships with established infrastructure providers, enhancing reliability and scalability. The clear community code of conduct and active moderation contribute to a safe and welcoming environment, which is a competitive advantage in the social media space. Growth potential exists through expanding community engagement and possibly integrating additional FLOSS-related services. The absence of commercial advertising and emphasis on privacy and open communication further differentiate FLOSS.social from mainstream social networks.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

a*****@floss.social

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

FLOSS.social exhibits a solid security posture with mandatory HTTPS, no exposed sensitive data, and active community moderation backed by a comprehensive code of conduct. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in formal security governance. The lack of advanced security headers suggests potential enhancements to mitigate risks such as clickjacking or content injection. Privacy compliance is generally good, but the missing cookie consent mechanism is a notable gap. Overall, the platform balances openness with safety effectively but should formalize and publicize its security practices to meet higher compliance standards and user expectations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

FLOSS.social

Description:

FLOSS.social is a Mastodon server launched on 1 April 2018 for people who care about, support, or build Free, Libre, and Open Source Software (FLOSS). It encourages community discussions beyond just FLOSS and recommends posting in English for broader engagement. The service is maintained with infrastructure from Masto.Host, OVH, BunnyCDN, and SparkPost, and uses a modified TangerineUI for Mastodon.

Key Services:
Decentralized social media hostingCommunity engagement platformSupporter program for sustainability
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
MastodonTangerineUIJavaScriptReactRuby on Rails (implied by Mastodon)Liberapay (support platform)
Frameworks:
MastodonTangerineUI
Platforms:
FediverseMastodon
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of community moderation and code of conduct

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Liberapay
Transparency Level:excellent

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a Mastodon instance focused on FLOSS community.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

75/100
Score

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0"

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_mailcust.gandi.net include:_spf.sparkpostmail.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:admin@floss.social

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 32 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:floss.social
Issuer:E6
Valid Until:10/7/2025 (32 days)
SANs:floss.social

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DNS Records

A Records:217.182.80.236
AAAA Records:2001:41d0:302:1100::1:7615
Name Servers:
ns1.digitalocean.comDNS only
ns2.digitalocean.comDNS only
ns3.digitalocean.comDNS only
MX Records:
50: fb.mail.gandi.net
10: spool.mail.gandi.net
SOA:Serial: 1754766720, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:30ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_mailcust.gandi.net include:_spf.sparkpostmail.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Mastodon platform with a customized TangerineUI frontend, utilizing modern JavaScript and React frameworks. Hosting is distributed across reputable providers including Masto.Host, OVH, BunnyCDN, and SparkPost, ensuring reliable infrastructure and content delivery. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the federated nature of Mastodon and external resource loading. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or platform-specific content management approach. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced further by improving security headers and formalizing privacy and security documentation.
Analyze Another Website