Skip to main content

Is flower.ai a Scam? Security Check Results - Flower Labs GmbH Reviews

flower.ai favicon

Is flower.ai Safe? Security Analysis for Flower Labs GmbH

Check if flower.ai is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyGermanymedium
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptPython (implied by tutorials)AWS DNS hosting
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 8:13:53 PM
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Flower Labs GmbH operates the website flower.ai, which provides a federated AI framework designed to unify federated learning, analytics, and evaluation across multiple machine learning frameworks and programming languages. The company is positioned as a leading technology provider in the federated learning space, with strong academic and industry adoption, evidenced by testimonials and usage by top universities and companies. The website offers extensive tutorials, documentation, and community engagement channels, including Slack and discussion forums, supporting both researchers and enterprises. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and optimized for performance and mobile devices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and some security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is good with a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service available, though no explicit cookie consent mechanism was detected. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained, with a high AI score reflecting content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy, and business credibility.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsJavaScriptPython (implied by tutorials)AWS DNS hosting

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Flower Labs GmbH targets the technology sector, focusing on federated learning frameworks for AI applications. Their business model includes open source software with enterprise solutions and community-driven growth. The company benefits from a strong ecosystem of academic and industry partners, enhancing its market position. Revenue streams likely include enterprise licensing, consulting, and event participation. The company demonstrates growth through active community engagement, frequent events, and a well-maintained GitHub repository. Strategic partnerships and a clear focus on scalability and interoperability position Flower Labs as a competitive player in the federated AI market.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections such as clientTransferProhibited status. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No security.txt or explicit incident response contact information was found, indicating room for improvement in transparency and incident handling readiness. The absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests potential enhancements to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional best practices and explicit security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Flower Labs GmbH

Description:

A unified approach to federated learning, analytics, and evaluation. Federate any workload, any ML framework, and any programming language.

Key Services:
Federated learning frameworkTutorials and documentationCommunity support and eventsEnterprise solutions
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptPython (implied by tutorials)AWS DNS hosting
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
lu.ma
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional, well-maintained open source project site

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1320-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@flower.ai

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 74 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
7 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(570 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
ns-1510.awsdns-60.org
ns-1609.awsdns-09.co.uk
ns-214.awsdns-26.com
ns-948.awsdns-54.net
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:67ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern technology stack centered around Next.js and React, providing server-side rendering and optimized performance. Hosting is managed via AWS DNS services, indicating reliable infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. Performance is fast with preloading of fonts and images. The technical implementation supports scalability and extensibility, aligning with the company's federated learning framework goals. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and implement advanced privacy controls.
Analyze Another Website