
Is flyingboards.lv Safe? Security Analysis for DŽETBORDU ĪRES SERVISS BALTIJAS VALSTĪS
Check if flyingboards.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Flyingboards.lv is a Latvian-based business specializing in jetboard rental and sales, targeting water sports enthusiasts and tourists in the Baltic region. The company offers additional services such as yacht trips and training for jetboard riding, positioning itself as the first jetboard rental service in the Baltics. The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies and providing a mobile-optimized, user-friendly experience with multiple interactive forms for service booking and purchases. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and form validations, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy, but the website content and technical setup suggest a legitimate small business operation.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The business operates in the transportation and hospitality sectors, focusing on active leisure and water sports in Latvia and the Baltic states. Its business model combines service rental and product sales, with a clear target audience of adventurous individuals seeking unique water experiences. The company maintains an Instagram presence for marketing and customer engagement. The website's content quality and branding are consistent, supporting a moderate level of trustworthiness. However, the lack of visible company registration details, privacy policies, and direct contact information may hinder full credibility. The business appears small-sized with localized market focus and no evident parent or subsidiary companies.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS and uses form validation to protect user input, which are positive security practices. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain web-based attacks. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, limiting transparency in security incident handling. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance risk under GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better policy disclosures and security headers.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Džetbordu noma un pārdošana Latvijā. Jūsu gaida aizraujošas ūdens piedzīvojumi! Mēs mācām braukt, organizējam izbraucienus ar jahtu. Pievienojieties mums!
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Form validation on inputs
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple interactive forms.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
No email authentication configured
CRITICALDomain is vulnerable to email spoofing
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 66 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings