Skip to main content

Is fmm.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA FMM Reviews

S

Is fmm.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA FMM

Check if fmm.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingLatviasmall
JavaScriptjQuery 1.9.1Prototype.jsScriptaculousBootstrap CSS and JS+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:44:08 PM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIA FMM is a Latvian manufacturing company specializing in forestry, construction, and agricultural machinery equipment. Established in 2008, it has developed a presence in the Scandinavian market, offering products designed for durability and efficiency using advanced metalworking technologies. The website content reflects a small-sized enterprise focused on industrial manufacturing with partnerships in Scandinavia. Technically, the website uses older JavaScript libraries and Bootstrap for styling but lacks modern security headers and privacy policies. The absence of contact information and compliance documents reduces trust and privacy compliance. Security posture is moderate with potential vulnerabilities due to outdated libraries and missing security headers. Overall, the website is accessible and functional but requires improvements in security, privacy, and technical modernization to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptjQuery 1.9.1Prototype.jsScriptaculousBootstrap CSS and JSHighslide JS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in a niche manufacturing sector targeting forestry and agricultural machinery markets primarily in Latvia and Scandinavia. Its business model centers on producing specialized metal components and equipment using advanced technologies such as plasma and laser cutting. Partnerships with Scandinavian firms and EU regional funding indicate strategic growth and market integration. The company appears to be a small enterprise with a focused product offering and a stable market position. However, limited online presence details and lack of contact information may hinder customer engagement and trust.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website lacks visible security headers and uses outdated JavaScript libraries, which may expose it to known vulnerabilities. No HTTPS enforcement data is available, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating gaps in compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The absence of contact information for incident response or security policies further reduces security maturity. While no critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected, the site would benefit from modernization of its tech stack, implementation of security best practices, and enhanced privacy compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade JavaScript libraries to current supported versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA FMM

Description:

SIA FMM is a Latvian company specializing in manufacturing equipment for forestry, construction, and agricultural machinery. Since 2008, it has been successfully operating in the Scandinavian market, offering products with effective design and technological solutions ensuring long service life. The company uses advanced metalworking technologies and high-quality materials such as weldox700 and hardox 450.

Key Services:
Manufacturing of forestry grapples and machinery equipmentMetalworking services including plasma/laser cutting, welding, and millingProduct design and technological development
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptjQuery 1.9.1Prototype.jsScriptaculousBootstrap CSS and JSHighslide JS
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • No forms detected to analyze for secure input handling

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 85 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

5 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:185.140.164.57
Name Servers:
ns1.sh5138.sd.eurovps.comDNS only
ns2.sh5138.sd.eurovps.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025072601, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:95ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a combination of older JavaScript libraries including Prototype.js, Scriptaculous, and jQuery 1.9.1, alongside Bootstrap for styling. The site loads external scripts from Google Analytics and YouTube embeds. The HTML structure is basic with limited modern SEO or accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no explicit mobile optimization detected beyond Bootstrap usage. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. The site would benefit from modernization to improve performance, security, and user experience.
Analyze Another Website