Skip to main content

Is focus-epaper.de a Scam? Security Check Results - BurdaVerlag Publishing GmbH Reviews

focus-epaper.de favicon

Is focus-epaper.de Safe? Security Analysis for BurdaVerlag Publishing GmbH

https://focus-epaper.de

Check if focus-epaper.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaGermanylarge
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptFontAwesome Pro
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 3:14:21 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The FOCUS E-Paper Plattform is a digital subscription service operated by BurdaVerlag Publishing GmbH, a reputable media company in Germany. The platform provides users with access to digital magazine content via login and subscription management. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, targeting German-speaking customers interested in digital media subscriptions. The business model centers on subscription-based access to e-paper content, positioning the company as a significant player in the German digital media market. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and FontAwesome Pro icons, with indications of Bootstrap and Symfony frameworks. The domain is managed via MarkMonitor name servers, reflecting professional domain management. The site is mobile-optimized with good user experience, though some SEO and accessibility features could be enhanced. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens in forms, indicating basic security hygiene. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided content, and no incident response or security policy information is published. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy on a related domain, but no cookie consent mechanism is evident. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were found, and the domain registration is consistent with the business identity. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with good business credibility and a solid technical foundation. Strategic improvements in security headers, cookie consent, and incident response transparency would enhance the security posture and privacy compliance, further strengthening user trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptFontAwesome Pro

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

FOCUS E-Paper Plattform operates within the media sector, leveraging BurdaVerlag's established brand to offer digital magazine subscriptions. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its integration with a well-known publisher and a clear focus on e-paper delivery. Revenue streams are primarily subscription fees. The target customers are German-speaking digital readers seeking convenient access to magazine content. The partnership ecosystem includes related domains such as focus-abo.de, which likely handles subscription sales and customer management. Growth indicators include professional domain management and consistent branding. The business model is subscription-centric, with potential for expansion into additional digital content services.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

+4907816******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. Use of HTTPS and CSRF tokens in login forms are positive indicators. However, the absence of visible security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency. Data protection practices appear aligned with GDPR through a comprehensive privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

BurdaVerlag Publishing GmbH

Description:

FOCUS E-Paper Plattform - E-Paper Downloads

Key Services:
E-Paper login and accessUser registrationSubscription management
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptFontAwesome Pro
Frameworks:
Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes)Symfony (implied by form token naming conventions)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of CSRF token in login form
  • Password input with toggle visibility

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 56 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:138.201.122.89
Name Servers:
ns1.markmonitor.com
ns2.markmonitor.com
ns3.markmonitor.com
ns4.markmonitor.com
ns5.markmonitor.com
ns6.markmonitor.com
ns7.markmonitor.com
SOA:Serial: 2023061901, TTL: 172800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:79ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack with HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and FontAwesome Pro icons. The presence of Bootstrap classes and Symfony-style form tokens suggests use of these frameworks. Hosting and DNS are managed by MarkMonitor, indicating professional infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. However, no CMS is explicitly detected. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve SEO, accessibility, and security headers. No third-party analytics or advertising scripts were detected, indicating a minimal tracking footprint. Overall, the technical implementation supports a stable and professional user experience.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about focus-epaper.de

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website