Skip to main content

Is fondation-minkoff.ch a Scam? Security Check Results - Fondation Minkoff Reviews

fondation-minkoff.ch favicon

Is fondation-minkoff.ch Safe? Security Analysis for Fondation Minkoff

https://fondation-minkoff.ch

Check if fondation-minkoff.ch is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitSwitzerlandsmall
WordPressElementorYoast SEOWP RocketjQuery
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 6:56:23 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Fondation Minkoff is a Swiss philanthropic foundation established in 2009, focusing on supporting projects in social action, culture, education, and scientific research. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, targeting non-profit organizations, students, researchers, and cultural actors. The business model is centered on philanthropy and financial support for general interest projects. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, with performance optimization via WP Rocket. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced, but lacks explicit security headers and detailed security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with privacy and cookie policies present but no consent mechanism. Contact information is limited to a contact form, with no direct emails or phone numbers visible. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the website content, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorYoast SEOWP RocketjQuery

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The foundation operates in the philanthropic non-profit sector in Switzerland, supporting diverse projects in humanitarian aid, culture, and education. Its competitive advantage lies in its focused support for impactful projects and collaborations with other foundations. The business model relies on donations and grants, targeting associations, students, and cultural institutions. The website indicates a small-sized organization with a clear mission and consistent branding. There is no evidence of commercial activities or revenue streams beyond philanthropy. The foundation maintains a professional online presence but could enhance transparency by providing more direct contact details and detailed policies.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable WordPress plugins for SEO and performance. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency in security matters. The absence of direct contact emails and phone numbers reduces attack surface but also limits user trust. No signs of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, explicit security policies, and incident response contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Fondation Minkoff

Description:

Fondation familiale philanthropique créée en 2009, soutenant des projets d’intérêt général dans les domaines de l’action sociale, la culture, l’éducation et la recherche scientifique.

Key Services:
Soutien financier à projets humanitairesSoutien à la cultureSoutien à l’éducation et à la recherche scientifique
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorYoast SEOWP RocketjQuery
Frameworks:
Elementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and performance plugins (WP Rocket)

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all IN TXT v=spf1 include:spf.infomaniak.ch -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 55 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:fondation-minkoff.ch
Issuer:R12
Valid Until:11/28/2025 (55 days)
SANs:fondation-minkoff.ch

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:217.26.51.52
AAAA Records:2a00:d70:0:b:2002:0:d91a:3334
Name Servers:
ns.hostpoint.chDNS only
ns2.hostpoint.chDNS only
ns3.hostpoint.chDNS only
MX Records:
0: fondationminkoff-ch02c.mail.protection.outlook.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a mature and maintainable technical stack. Performance is optimized with WP Rocket, and fonts are loaded from Google Fonts with preload hints. The site is responsive and mobile-friendly. No major technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. However, the lack of security headers and limited privacy compliance are technical gaps. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the foundation's mission but can be enhanced with improved security and privacy features.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about fondation-minkoff.ch

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website