Is foodservice.in Safe? Security Analysis for FoodService Expo 2014
Check if foodservice.in is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The website www.foodservice.in is dedicated to the FoodService Expo 2014, an event aimed at connecting suppliers and operators in the food service industry in India. The site serves as an informational platform for the expo, including details about the event, exhibitors, visitors, and a related Conclave for industry knowledge sharing. The business model centers on event organization and industry networking within the hospitality sector. However, the website content is outdated, focusing on a 2014 event, and lacks modern features or updated information. Technically, the website relies heavily on deprecated Flash technology, which severely limits accessibility and compatibility with modern browsers. There is no evidence of modern web frameworks, CMS, or responsive design, resulting in poor performance, accessibility, and user experience. The site lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, indicating a weak security posture. From a security and compliance perspective, the website does not provide privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, nor does it show any GDPR compliance indicators. No contact information or incident response channels are visible, and no security best practices are implemented. The absence of HTTPS and use of Flash are critical vulnerabilities that expose users to risks. Overall, the website presents a low trustworthiness and professionalism level, with significant technical debt and security gaps. Strategic improvements are necessary to modernize the platform, enhance security, and comply with privacy regulations to regain user trust and operational viability.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The FoodService Expo 2014 website targets a niche market within the hospitality industry in India, focusing on event-based networking and business development for food service suppliers and operators. The business model is event-centric, generating value through exhibitions and knowledge forums. The site lacks updated content and digital maturity, which may limit its competitive advantage and growth potential. There is no visible partnership ecosystem or diversified revenue streams. The absence of clear business contact information and certifications reduces credibility. Growth indicators are not apparent due to outdated content and minimal digital engagement.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website's security posture is weak, with no HTTPS detected and no security headers implemented. The use of Flash technology introduces significant vulnerabilities, as Flash is no longer supported and is a known attack vector. There are no visible privacy or cookie policies, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response readiness is absent, with no security or abuse contact channels provided. The site does not employ modern security best practices, exposing users and the business to potential risks. Overall, the security maturity level is low, requiring urgent remediation.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Migrate the website from Flash to modern web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript to improve accessibility and security.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
FoodService Expo 2014 provides a unique platform for industry suppliers to interact, network and do business with restaurants, bakers and caterers. The event includes a Conclave for knowledge sharing and networking within the food service industry in India.
basic
moderate
Technical Stack
slow
poor
poor
basic
Security Assessment
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website uses outdated Flash technology extensively, which is deprecated and unsupported in modern browsers.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Facebook
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 34 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings