Is forests.org Safe? Security Analysis for Sustainable Forestry Initiative
Check if forests.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) operates forests.org as a professional, well-established non-profit organization focused on advancing sustainability through forest-focused collaborations. The website serves as a hub for certification standards, educational resources, conservation and community grants, and networking for forestry stakeholders. With a domain age dating back to 1996, the organization demonstrates longevity and credibility in its sector. The site targets environmental organizations, businesses involved in forestry products, educators, and community members, providing comprehensive resources and certification information. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with the Avada theme, integrating WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities and leveraging modern analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized and features good SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. Privacy compliance is a notable gap, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, which should be addressed to meet GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and serves its mission effectively, but could improve in privacy and security transparency.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
SFI holds a strong market position as a leader in sustainable forestry certification and advocacy. Its business model revolves around non-profit activities including setting standards, third-party audits, education, and community engagement. Revenue streams likely include certification fees, grants, and educational product sales. The organization maintains a robust partnership ecosystem with social media presence and related domains such as sfidatabase.org for certificate verification. The website content and structure support growth and stakeholder engagement, although the absence of explicit privacy and security policies may pose compliance risks. The long domain history and consistent branding reinforce credibility and trust within the environmental and forestry sectors.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Phone Numbers (2)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and reCAPTCHA is used to protect forms from abuse. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and common security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly set, which could expose the site to certain risks. No vulnerability disclosure or security contact information is provided, limiting incident response readiness. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies, which could lead to regulatory scrutiny. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but would benefit from enhancements in DNS security, header implementation, and transparency.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Sustainable Forestry Initiative
Our mission is to advance sustainability through forest-focused collaborations.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
- No exposed sensitive data found in HTML
- Use of third-party analytics with opt-out mechanisms
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and structured content.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 75 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings