Is fork.ai Safe? Security Analysis for Fork Inc.
Check if fork.ai is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Fork.ai is a technology company specializing in B2B lead generation by providing verified emails and contact data for app leads. The company targets businesses seeking to boost cloud growth through targeted prospecting and competitor research. Their platform offers services such as sales prospecting, partnership discovery, and email marketing, positioning them as a niche player in the lead generation market. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and uses modern web technologies including the Astro framework and Cloudflare hosting. Analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Plausible, and Intercom are integrated to support business intelligence and customer engagement. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and some security headers are not explicitly present. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy available but lacking explicit cookie consent mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website and domain registration data indicate a legitimate, small-sized technology business with moderate trustworthiness and good technical maturity.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Fork.ai operates in the technology sector focusing on lead generation and sales prospecting for B2B clients. The business model revolves around providing verified contact data to improve marketing and sales efficiency. The company has been active since 2017 and maintains partnerships such as with Apache Answer. Their digital presence includes active social media channels and a blog, supporting content marketing efforts. The platform is positioned to serve businesses looking for competitive advantage through technology signals and verified leads. Revenue streams likely include subscription or usage-based fees for access to app leads and contact data. The company demonstrates consistent branding and professional content, supporting credibility in its niche market.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Physical Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The security maturity of Fork.ai is moderate to good. The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS services, providing a baseline of security and performance. The domain is protected against unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be a potential risk for DNS spoofing. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected, which could be improved to mitigate common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency for security communications. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhancements in DNS security, header policies, and published security governance.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Fork Inc.
Boost B2B cloud growth with targeted leads generation. Prospect better with truly verified email addresses and scale your business with unlimited App Leads.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
good
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Domain status clientTransferProhibited
- Use of Cloudflare DNS and security services
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration
LOWCurrent value: "max-age=0; includeSubDomains; preload"
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, banking, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 73 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Certificate Details
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings