Skip to main content

Is formel1.de a Scam? Security Check Results - formel1.de Reviews

formel1.de favicon

Is formel1.de Safe? Security Analysis for Formel 1 live: Alle Formel-1-Rennen & Termine - Formel1.de

Check if formel1.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaGermanymedium
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsContentPass (paywall/consent management)Sourcepoint (consent management)+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 7:02:12 PM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Formel1.de is a German-language media portal dedicated to Formula 1 racing, providing live race coverage, results, schedules, and news about drivers and teams. The website targets a broad audience interested in motorsport, particularly Formula 1 fans in Germany. It holds a strong market position as a popular source for F1 content in the German-speaking region. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript frameworks and integrates consent management tools such as Sourcepoint and ContentPass, indicating a mature approach to privacy compliance. Hosting is managed by plusserver.com, a professional hosting provider, ensuring reliable infrastructure. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and includes Google site verification, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies, which could be improved. No WAF or blocking mechanisms interfere with content accessibility. Overall, the site demonstrates good content quality, technical implementation, and business credibility, though privacy and security documentation could be enhanced.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsContentPass (paywall/consent management)Sourcepoint (consent management)Privacy Management scripts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website operates as a media/news portal focused on Formula 1, monetizing likely through advertising and possibly subscription or paywall mechanisms (ContentPass integration). Its target customers are motorsport enthusiasts, especially German-speaking Formula 1 fans. The site leverages partnerships with advertising and consent management providers to optimize revenue and compliance. The presence of official app references and social media integration suggests a multi-channel content distribution strategy. While no explicit company or legal information is found, the domain's hosting and DNS setup indicate a professional operation. Growth indicators include active content updates and integration of modern tracking and marketing tools.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Formel1.de maintains a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google site verification. Consent management scripts indicate awareness of GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The site would benefit from publishing a security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but improvable.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy to improve transparency and GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Die F1 auf Formel1.de: Formel 1 live, Formel-1-Ergebnisse, Formel-1-Termine, F1-News und Formel-1-Fahrer und Teams

Key Services:
Live Formula 1 race coverageRace results and schedulesNews about Formula 1 drivers and teams
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsContentPass (paywall/consent management)Sourcepoint (consent management)Privacy Management scripts
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google site verification meta tag present
  • Consent management implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
ContentPassSourcepoint
Marketing Tools:
OneSignal (push notifications)
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a German-language Formula 1 news and results portal.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

85/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

7/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:80.237.131.66 a:formel1.de ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:80.237.131.75
Name Servers:
ns1.plusserver.com
ns2.plusserver.com
ns3.plusserver.com
MX Records:
10: mail.formel1.de
SOA:Serial: 2025090302, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:124ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:80.237.131.66 a:formel1.de ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with integrations for analytics (Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager), consent management (Sourcepoint, ContentPass), and push notifications (OneSignal). Hosting is provided by plusserver.com, indicating professional infrastructure. Performance is moderate with some preloading and preconnect optimizations. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. Mobile optimization is good, with viewport settings and app references. However, no CMS or backend technology is explicitly detected. Technical debt is minimal from the front-end perspective, but improvements in security headers and accessibility could be made to reduce risks and improve compliance.
Analyze Another Website