Skip to main content

Is forta.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Forta Reviews

forta.org favicon

Is forta.org Safe? Security Analysis for Forta

Check if forta.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
Webflow CMSjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Hotjar+4 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 10:41:55 PM
68
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Forta is a technology company specializing in onchain security and compliance solutions for blockchain developers and protocols. Their flagship product, Forta Firewall, leverages advanced AI detection models to provide real-time monitoring, threat prevention, and compliance screening, aiming to prevent over 99% of hacks. The company is positioned as a trusted partner to top blockchain chains and platforms, including Binance, Phantom, Celo, and others, reflecting a strong market presence in the blockchain security sector. The website content is professional and well-structured, targeting teams building onchain who require robust risk management tools.

Detected Technologies

Webflow CMSjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)HotjarSwiper.jsCountUp.jsRive animationsAJAX form submission

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Forta operates a Security as a Service business model focused on blockchain ecosystems. Their revenue streams likely include subscription or usage fees for their firewall and monitoring services. The company benefits from strategic partnerships with leading blockchain projects and infrastructure providers, enhancing their market reach and credibility. The presence of case studies and testimonials from reputable partners indicates a mature partnership ecosystem and a growing customer base. Forta's integration ease and no-dev setup approach lower adoption barriers, supporting growth and competitive advantage.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools is implemented with asynchronous loading to minimize performance impact. However, the absence of explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts represents an area for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, which could enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be strengthened by formalizing security governance and compliance disclosures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve privacy compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Forta

Description:

Forta provides onchain security and compliance solutions, including real-time monitoring and threat prevention for teams building on blockchain protocols and rollups.

Key Services:
Onchain security monitoringThreat preventionCompliance screeningReal-time alertsFirewall integration
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Webflow CMSjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)HotjarSwiper.jsCountUp.jsRive animationsAJAX form submission
Frameworks:
Webflow
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • AJAX form submission with error handling
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Hotjar for analytics with async loading

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHotjar
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Twitter Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Hotjar
Marketing Tools:
Hotjar
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:amazonses.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-reports@forta.org

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 17 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
9 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1221 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:75.2.70.75, 99.83.190.102
Name Servers:
ns-1235.awsdns-26.org
ns-1584.awsdns-06.co.uk
ns-434.awsdns-54.com
ns-978.awsdns-58.net
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:82ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:amazonses.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Swiper.js for sliders, CountUp.js for animated counters, and Rive for interactive animations. Google Tag Manager and Hotjar are used for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site is hosted on Webflow's CDN, ensuring fast loading times and excellent mobile optimization. Accessibility features such as focus-visible outlines and responsive typography are implemented, contributing to a good user experience. The technical implementation is modern and well-maintained, with opportunities to enhance security headers and privacy disclosures.
Analyze Another Website