Skip to main content

Is foundationcapital.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Foundation Capital Reviews

F

Is foundationcapital.com Safe? Security Analysis for Foundation Capital

Check if foundationcapital.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceUnited Stateslarge
WordPressElementorjQueryFlickity carouselGSAP animation+2 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 3:11:04 AM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Foundation Capital is a well-established venture capital firm founded in 1996, specializing in seed and growth-stage investments primarily in fintech, enterprise software, and crypto sectors. The company positions itself as a partner to founders, emphasizing a disciplined investment approach and thought leadership through various content channels such as newsletters, podcasts, and events. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and consistent branding aligned with its market positioning. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor, enhanced with modern JavaScript libraries like Flickity, GSAP, and ScrollMagic for interactive and animated content. Hosting and DNS services leverage Cloudflare, providing robust performance and security benefits. SEO is well-implemented with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data, contributing to excellent search visibility. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, ensuring a broad user reach. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism despite active tracking scripts indicates a gap in privacy compliance, particularly under GDPR. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could be improved to strengthen trust and readiness. Overall, Foundation Capital's website demonstrates high business credibility and technical maturity with minor areas for security and privacy enhancement. The risk profile is low, but strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency are advised to maintain leadership and trust in a regulated environment.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorjQueryFlickity carouselGSAP animationScrollMagicCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Foundation Capital operates as a specialized venture capital firm with a focus on fintech, enterprise, and crypto startups. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing market presence since 1996 and a disciplined investment philosophy. The firm targets founders and entrepreneurs seeking seed and growth capital, leveraging a portfolio services approach to add value beyond funding. Revenue streams are primarily from investment returns and management fees. The company maintains an active partnership ecosystem evident from its content collaborations and social media engagement. Growth indicators include recent announcements of new funds and active thought leadership content. Operationally, the firm emphasizes high-touch, high-conviction investments, positioning itself as a trusted partner in the venture ecosystem.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer lock enabled, reducing risk of domain hijacking. However, the lack of DNSSEC leaves DNS queries vulnerable to spoofing attacks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating cross-site scripting and clickjacking risks. The site uses multiple third-party tracking scripts without a visible cookie consent mechanism, posing privacy compliance risks under GDPR. No published security or incident response policies limit transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the content. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, DNSSEC, and privacy controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to secure DNS resolution and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Foundation Capital

Description:

Since the beginning of invention, humanity has advanced because the remarkable have pushed us forward. Across the ages, we’ve had many names for these people. At Foundation Capital, we call them founders.

Key Services:
Seed-stage investingGrowth-stage investingPortfolio servicesThought leadership via newsletters, podcasts, and events
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorjQueryFlickity carouselGSAP animationScrollMagicCloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
Yoast SEO
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

excellent

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via GTM)LinkedIn InsightAdRollMetricool
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
AdRoll
Tracking Pixels:
LinkedIn InsightAdRollMetricool
Marketing Tools:
AdRollMetricool
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed with clear branding and navigation.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:66.201.42.176/28 ip4:173.8.168.233/29 ip4:208.117.50.199 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_netblocks.mimecast.com include:sendgrid.net -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 86 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
29 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(921 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:141.193.213.11
Name Servers:
darwin.ns.cloudflare.com
lily.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com
10: us-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com
SOA:Serial: 2382423889, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:140ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:66.201.42.176/28 ip4:173.8.168.233/29 ip4:208.117.50.199 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_netblocks.mimecast.com include:sendgrid.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building, supported by JavaScript libraries such as Flickity for carousels, GSAP and ScrollMagic for animations, and jQuery for DOM manipulation. SEO is enhanced with Yoast SEO plugin and structured JSON-LD data for rich search results. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and DNS services that improve performance and security. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with some heavy images and scripts that could be optimized further. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms to reduce technical risks.
Analyze Another Website