Skip to main content

Is foundersfund.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Founders Fund Reviews

foundersfund.com favicon

Is foundersfund.com Safe? Security Analysis for Founders Fund

Check if foundersfund.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Stateslarge
WordPressYoast SEO pluginGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerTypekit fonts+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 12:50:37 AM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Founders Fund is a well-established San Francisco-based venture capital firm specializing in investments in revolutionary technology companies. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging WordPress CMS with SEO optimizations and multimedia content to showcase its portfolio. The firm maintains a strong market position with notable investments in companies such as Anduril, SpaceX, and Palantir. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies and is mobile optimized, though performance is moderate. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and domain protections in place, but lacks some advanced security headers and published policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is credible and trustworthy but could improve compliance and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO pluginGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerTypekit fontsHTML5 video

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the venture capital sector focusing on technology startups, targeting entrepreneurs and investors. Its business model centers on funding innovative companies with high growth potential. The website's content and linked domains indicate a strong partnership ecosystem with leading technology firms. The firm benefits from a long domain history and consistent branding. However, the lack of explicit contact information and compliance documentation may limit user trust and regulatory adherence. Growth indicators include active content updates and multimedia engagement. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance transparency and security communication.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain status flags preventing unauthorized domain changes. However, it lacks DNSSEC and common security headers, which are recommended to mitigate DNS and web-based attacks. No forms or input fields reduce attack surface, but absence of published security policies and incident response contacts indicates limited transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Compliance gaps exist regarding GDPR and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, security is adequate but could be strengthened by implementing recommended headers, policies, and disclosure mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Founders Fund

Description:

Founders Fund is a San Francisco based venture capital firm investing in companies building revolutionary technologies.

Key Services:
Venture capital fundingInvestment in revolutionary technology companies
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO pluginGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerTypekit fontsHTML5 video
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of clientDeleteProhibited and other domain status flags to prevent unauthorized changes

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEO
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

100/100
Score
No issues found
SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:nxn863dang.powerspf.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:7mgxeun9er@rua.powerdmarc.com
Forensic Reports:7mgxeun9er@ruf.powerdmarc.com
MTA-STS Details
Mode:testing
Max Age:1 days

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 23 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
26 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(3391 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.198.0.81
Name Servers:
park1.bluerazor.com
park2.bluerazor.com
MX Records:
10: us-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com
10: us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com
SOA:Serial: 2025062600, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:65ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:nxn863dang.powerspf.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. It uses Typekit for fonts and HTML5 video elements for rich media content. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata. Hosting details are limited but domain registrar is Blue Razor Domains, LLC. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and resource optimization. No accessibility features beyond basic were detected. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Analyze Another Website