Is foxland.fi Safe? Security Analysis for Fox Holding Oy
Check if foxland.fi is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Foxland.fi is a niche website operated by Fox Holding Oy, focusing on accessible web development primarily using WordPress and Eleventy. The site offers blog content, downloadable WordPress themes, and links to GitHub repositories, targeting web developers and creative professionals. The business is small, established in 2014, and based in Finland, with a consistent brand presence and positive trust indicators such as testimonials and active GitHub engagement. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including CSS Grid and JavaScript frameworks, hosted likely by the parent company's hosting provider foxnet.fi. The website is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, though performance is moderate. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. No contact emails or phone numbers are explicitly provided, which limits direct communication channels. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the website content and business entity, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Fox Holding Oy operates Foxland.fi as a specialized provider of accessible WordPress themes and web development resources. The business model centers on theme distribution and content publishing, targeting developers and creatives seeking accessible and modern web design solutions. The company maintains a small but focused market position with a clear niche. The website's integration with GitHub and WordPress.org themes indicates an open-source and community-driven approach. The absence of advertising and tracking suggests a privacy-conscious stance. Growth potential lies in expanding theme offerings and enhancing direct customer engagement. The company’s ecosystem includes social media presence on Twitter and WordPress profiles, reinforcing community ties.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Physical Addresses (1)
Company Registration
Fox Holding Oy
2227257-6
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a solid baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries detected. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security represents a missed opportunity to harden defenses against common web attacks. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident, which could delay mitigation of security issues. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for a small business but with room for improvement to meet higher compliance and protection standards.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, HSTS) to enhance protection against web attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Fox Holding Oy
Foxland is a website by Sami Keijonen, a front-end developer from Finland, focusing on building accessible websites mainly using WordPress and Eleventy. The site offers blog posts, downloadable WordPress themes, and links to GitHub repositories.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- No exposed sensitive data
- No vulnerable libraries detected
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is accessible and fully functional
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Twitter
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, banking
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
No email authentication configured
CRITICALDomain is vulnerable to email spoofing
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 74 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Certificate Details
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings