
Is foxnet.fi Safe? Security Analysis for Fox Holding Oy
Check if foxnet.fi is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

AI Summary
Foxnet, operated by Fox Holding Oy, is a Finnish small business specializing in accessible and user-friendly WordPress website development. The company is led by Sami Keijonen, who brings decades of experience and a strong focus on accessibility, UX, and project management. The website clearly communicates the services offered, including coding, auditing, training, and mentoring, targeting clients who value quality and accessibility in web development. The business model is service-based with hourly rates and project estimates, positioning Foxnet as a niche expert in the Finnish market. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including HTML, CSS, JavaScript, PHP, and React for block development. Hosting is provided by Shellit.org, a Finnish registrar and hosting provider. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and accessible, reflecting the business's core values. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of security headers and privacy/cookie policies represents compliance and security gaps that should be addressed. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be improved to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, Foxnet presents a professional, trustworthy, and technically competent web presence with strong business credibility. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security hardening would elevate the site's security posture and regulatory adherence.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Foxnet operates in the technology sector focusing on web development services with a specialization in accessibility and WordPress. The company leverages a strong personal brand and technical expertise to serve a niche market of clients valuing accessible and maintainable websites. The business model is consultancy and project-based, with transparent pricing and client testimonials enhancing credibility. Partnerships with firms like MEOM indicate a collaborative ecosystem for larger projects. The company targets Finnish and potentially international clients seeking high-quality front-end and accessibility solutions. Growth potential lies in expanding training and mentoring services alongside development work.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Physical Addresses (1)
Company Registration
Fox Holding Oy
2227257-6
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating GDPR compliance gaps. Absence of incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies limits transparency and preparedness. No known vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, privacy notices, and incident response information to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Fox Holding Oy
Foxnet is a business focused on coding accessible, user-friendly, and visually appealing WordPress websites. The owner, Sami Keijonen, offers services including website coding, UX refinement, project management, accessibility audits, training, and mentoring.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
excellent
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- No visible vulnerable libraries
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible and not blocked by any WAF or security mechanism.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Twitter, LinkedIn
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
No email authentication configured
CRITICALDomain is vulnerable to email spoofing
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Unable to retrieve SSL certificate
CRITICALCould not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings