Skip to main content

Is foxnet.fi a Scam? Security Check Results - Fox Holding Oy Reviews

foxnet.fi favicon

Is foxnet.fi Safe? Security Analysis for Fox Holding Oy

Check if foxnet.fi is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyFinlandsmall
HTMLCSSJavaScriptPHPReact
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 8:43:01 AM
33
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Foxnet, operated by Fox Holding Oy, is a Finnish small business specializing in accessible and user-friendly WordPress website development. The company is led by Sami Keijonen, who brings decades of experience and a strong focus on accessibility, UX, and project management. The website clearly communicates the services offered, including coding, auditing, training, and mentoring, targeting clients who value quality and accessibility in web development. The business model is service-based with hourly rates and project estimates, positioning Foxnet as a niche expert in the Finnish market. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including HTML, CSS, JavaScript, PHP, and React for block development. Hosting is provided by Shellit.org, a Finnish registrar and hosting provider. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and accessible, reflecting the business's core values. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of security headers and privacy/cookie policies represents compliance and security gaps that should be addressed. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be improved to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, Foxnet presents a professional, trustworthy, and technically competent web presence with strong business credibility. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security hardening would elevate the site's security posture and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

HTMLCSSJavaScriptPHPReact

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Foxnet operates in the technology sector focusing on web development services with a specialization in accessibility and WordPress. The company leverages a strong personal brand and technical expertise to serve a niche market of clients valuing accessible and maintainable websites. The business model is consultancy and project-based, with transparent pricing and client testimonials enhancing credibility. Partnerships with firms like MEOM indicate a collaborative ecosystem for larger projects. The company targets Finnish and potentially international clients seeking high-quality front-end and accessibility solutions. Growth potential lies in expanding training and mentoring services alongside development work.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@foxnet.fi

Company Registration

Legal Name:

Fox Holding Oy

Registration Number:

2227257-6

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating GDPR compliance gaps. Absence of incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies limits transparency and preparedness. No known vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, privacy notices, and incident response information to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Fox Holding Oy

Description:

Foxnet is a business focused on coding accessible, user-friendly, and visually appealing WordPress websites. The owner, Sami Keijonen, offers services including website coding, UX refinement, project management, accessibility audits, training, and mentoring.

Key Services:
WordPress website developmentUX design and refinementProject managementAccessibility auditingAccessibility trainingFront-end mentoring
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTMLCSSJavaScriptPHPReact
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

excellent

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible and not blocked by any WAF or security mechanism.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Twitter, LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:164.215.39.202
AAAA Records:2a03:e581:4::12
Name Servers:
ns1.shellit.orgDNS only
ns1.z.fiDNS only
ns2.shellit.orgDNS only
ns2.z.fiDNS only
ns3.shellit.orgDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2020111915, TTL: 7200s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:67ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress theme with custom block development using React, indicating up-to-date front-end practices. The tech stack includes HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, PHP, and React for block editing. Hosting is managed by a Finnish provider, Shellit.org, with stable DNS configuration and no DNSSEC. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The site lacks some security headers which could improve security posture. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with opportunities for security and privacy enhancements.
Analyze Another Website