Skip to main content

Is foxtour.pro a Scam? Security Check Results - FoxESS Poland Reviews

foxtour.pro favicon

Is foxtour.pro Safe? Security Analysis for FoxESS Poland

Check if foxtour.pro is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyPolandmedium
JavaScript ES ModulesGoogle Tag ManagerCSSResponsive Images (AVIF, WebP)Preconnect and DNS Prefetch
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 12:27:20 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

FoxESS Poland operates a specialized training tour across Poland in 2025, focusing on the latest photovoltaic and energy storage technologies. The website serves as a professional platform to promote these events, targeting installers and photovoltaic professionals. The company leverages modern web technologies and maintains a consistent brand presence, including active social media channels. The domain is newly registered but aligns well with the event timeline, hosted by a reputable provider OVH SAS. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain protections, though improvements such as DNSSEC and security headers are recommended. Privacy compliance is partially met with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for user experience and mobile devices.

Detected Technologies

JavaScript ES ModulesGoogle Tag ManagerCSSResponsive Images (AVIF, WebP)Preconnect and DNS Prefetch

đź§ AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

FoxESS Poland positions itself as a key player in the photovoltaic training sector within Poland, offering hands-on training, product demonstrations, and networking opportunities. The business model revolves around event-based engagement with industry professionals, enhancing brand visibility and product adoption. The company benefits from a clear market focus and strong digital presence, including social media outreach. The lack of explicit contact details on the website suggests a controlled registration process, likely to maintain event exclusivity. The partnership with FoxESS and hosting by OVH SAS indicate a stable operational foundation. Growth potential exists through expanding training locations and leveraging digital marketing tools.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and domain status protections, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security represents areas for enhancement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could limit transparency in security matters. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, but no cookie consent mechanism is present, potentially impacting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in policy transparency and technical safeguards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

FoxESS Poland

Description:

FoxESS Poland organizes a training tour across Poland in 2025 to present the latest energy storage technologies and photovoltaic solutions by FoxESS. The event targets installers and professionals in the photovoltaic industry, offering product presentations, networking, and practical training.

Key Services:
Training sessionsProduct demonstrationsNetworking events
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScript ES ModulesGoogle Tag ManagerCSSResponsive Images (AVIF, WebP)Preconnect and DNS Prefetch
Frameworks:
Vue.js (inferred from data-v-* attributes)
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional event site for FoxESS Poland's 2025 training tour.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

đź“§Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:mx.ovh.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 69 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
low(317 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:75.2.60.5
Name Servers:
dns100.ovh.net
ns100.ovh.net
MX Records:
100: mx3.mail.ovh.net
1: mx1.mail.ovh.net
5: mx2.mail.ovh.net
SOA:Serial: 2025072200, TTL: 60s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:284ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:mx.ovh.com -all

⚡Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

đź”§Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including ES modules, responsive images in AVIF and WebP formats, and Vue.js framework inferred from HTML attributes. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site is hosted by OVH SAS, a reputable hosting provider. Performance optimizations such as preconnect, DNS prefetch, and resource preloading are implemented, contributing to fast load times. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which should be addressed to improve security posture.
Analyze Another Website