Skip to main content

Is fpib.com.au a Scam? Security Check Results - Fire Protection Industry (ODS & SGG) Board Reviews

fpib.com.au favicon

Is fpib.com.au Safe? Security Analysis for Fire Protection Industry (ODS & SGG) Board

Check if fpib.com.au is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyAustraliasmall
WordPressBootstrap 4.5.3Google reCAPTCHAGoogle AnalyticsContact Form 7+2 more
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 4:40:35 PM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Fire Protection Industry (ODS & SGG) Board operates as a government-affiliated regulatory body in Australia, managing the permit scheme for fire protection substances under the Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Program. The website serves industry professionals, license holders, and the public by providing licensing information, training resources, compliance reporting, and environmental protection campaigns. The organization maintains a clear market position as a specialized regulatory authority with a focus on fire safety and environmental stewardship. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and Elementor, integrating Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and content quality, though some accessibility features could be enhanced. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and spam protection in place, but lacks explicit security headers and a cookie consent mechanism. From a security perspective, the site shows no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of detailed WHOIS registrant information and security policies suggests room for improvement in transparency and compliance documentation. Overall, the domain appears legitimate and trustworthy, supported by government affiliation and professional content. Strategically, the site should focus on enhancing privacy compliance with cookie consent, implementing security headers, and publishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

WordPressBootstrap 4.5.3Google reCAPTCHAGoogle AnalyticsContact Form 7AkismetElementor

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization targets a niche regulatory market within the Australian fire protection and environmental sectors. Its business model revolves around licensing, compliance enforcement, and industry education, supported by government funding. The website reflects a small-sized entity with a focused service offering including permit issuance, training facilitation, and environmental campaigns such as the Halon Collection. Partnerships with government departments and industry stakeholders are evident through linked domains and content. Growth potential lies in expanding digital engagement and improving compliance support tools. The presence of social media channels indicates efforts to maintain community and industry relations.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

o*****@fpib.com.au

Phone Numbers (1)

038*******

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS encryption, use of Google reCAPTCHA to prevent spam, and Akismet integration for comment spam filtering. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security or incident response policies represent gaps in defense-in-depth and transparency. The site does not provide explicit GDPR or data protection officer information, which may be relevant given its Australian government affiliation and international visitors. Overall, the security culture appears adequate but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to improve browser security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Fire Protection Industry (ODS & SGG) Board

Description:

The Fire Protection Industry (ODS & SGG) Board administers the fire protection industry permit scheme for the Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Program on behalf of the Australian Government.

Key Services:
Licensing and permits for extinguishing agent handling and tradingIndustry information and news disseminationTraining provider listings and issue reportingField engagement programsHalon collection campaign
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressBootstrap 4.5.3Google reCAPTCHAGoogle AnalyticsContact Form 7AkismetElementor
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Spam protection via Akismet

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Google Site Kit
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:servers.mcsv.net -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 86 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:fpib.com.au
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:12/29/2025 (86 days)
SANs:fpib.com.au, *.fpib.com.au

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:104.26.2.145, 172.67.68.62, 104.26.3.145
AAAA Records:2606:4700:20::ac43:443e, 2606:4700:20::681a:291, 2606:4700:20::681a:391
Name Servers:
miles.ns.cloudflare.com
ruth.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
0: fpib-com-au.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2384705360, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:54ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:servers.mcsv.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform utilizing Bootstrap for responsive design and Elementor for page building. It integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site loads external resources from trusted domains such as Google Fonts and jQuery CDN. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities in accessibility and SEO. The technical stack is modern and widely supported, but the absence of certain security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates areas for technical improvement. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Analyze Another Website