Skip to main content

Is framework.ventures a Scam? Security Check Results - Framework Ventures Reviews

framework.ventures favicon

Is framework.ventures Safe? Security Analysis for Framework Ventures

Check if framework.ventures is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statesmedium
WebflowjQuery 3.5.1JavaScriptCSS
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 2:02:55 AM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Framework Ventures is a San Francisco-based crypto-native venture capital firm specializing in early-stage investments in DeFi, stablecoins, AI, and blockchain infrastructure. The firm positions itself as a high-conviction investor with check sizes ranging from $250k to $40 million, targeting innovative founders in the crypto space. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, supported by press mentions in reputable media such as CNBC and Bloomberg. Technically, the site is built on Webflow CMS with modern JavaScript and CSS, delivering fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS implied, but lacks explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is typical for VC firms, and does not raise immediate concerns. Overall, the site demonstrates a strong business credibility and digital maturity appropriate for its market segment.

Detected Technologies

WebflowjQuery 3.5.1JavaScriptCSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Framework Ventures operates in the competitive crypto venture capital market, leveraging its niche focus on blockchain and DeFi technologies to differentiate itself. The firm’s business model centers on early-stage investments and partnership with founders, supported by significant capital deployment capabilities. The presence of press coverage and a dedicated jobs portal indicates growth and active market engagement. The firm targets crypto startups and investors, positioning itself as a trusted partner in the blockchain ecosystem. The website’s clean design and clear navigation support user engagement, though the absence of direct contact emails and phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via forms.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms may pose compliance risks under GDPR or similar regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, indicating potential areas for improvement in security governance and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Framework Ventures

Description:

Framework Ventures is a leading crypto-native VC firm with a track record of partnering with winning founders. They are a San Francisco-based venture firm focused on DeFi, stablecoins, AI, and blockchain infrastructure, investing early-stage with check sizes from $250k to $40 million.

Key Services:
Early-stage venture fundingPartnership with foundersInvestment in DeFi, stablecoins, AI, blockchain infrastructure
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WebflowjQuery 3.5.1JavaScriptCSS
Frameworks:
Webflow
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:ipm4dec@ar.glockapps.com
Forensic Reports:ipm4dec@fr.glockapps.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 36 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:75.2.70.75, 99.83.190.102
Name Servers:
ethan.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
michelle.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2378205231, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:63ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern front-end technologies including JavaScript and jQuery 3.5.1. It is hosted on Webflow’s CDN infrastructure, contributing to fast load times and excellent mobile responsiveness. The site includes well-structured meta tags and Open Graph data for SEO and social sharing. No JSON-LD structured data was detected. The absence of explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms represents technical debt in security and privacy compliance. The site’s navigation is clear and user-friendly, with no broken links or errors observed. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional online presence but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Analyze Another Website