Skip to main content

Is franciskadraudze.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Rīgas Sv. Franciska Romas katoļu draudze Reviews

franciskadraudze.lv favicon

Is franciskadraudze.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Rīgas Sv. Franciska Romas katoļu draudze

Check if franciskadraudze.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitLatviasmall
WordPressElementorjQueryGiveWP (donation plugin)FontAwesome+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:11:22 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Rīgas Sv. Franciska Romas katoļu draudze is a local Roman Catholic parish church located in Riga, Latvia, serving the Latvian-speaking Catholic community. The website provides information about the church, its community groups, events, and donation options. It is positioned as a small non-profit religious organization within the Archdiocese of Riga. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Elementor and integrates donation functionality via GiveWP. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good SEO practices and basic accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorjQueryGiveWP (donation plugin)FontAwesomeGoogle FontsSwiper.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The church operates as a non-profit entity focused on religious services, community engagement, and charitable activities. Its market position is local and community-centric, targeting parishioners and local residents. The website supports community interaction through event announcements, group sign-ups, and donation collection. Social media presence on Facebook and YouTube enhances outreach. The business model relies on donations and community participation. Growth indicators include active event calendars and youth group engagement. No direct commercial partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the site content.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (8)

m*****@inbox.lv
t*****@inbox.lv
k*****@hotmail.com
a*****@franciskadraudze.lv
s*****@inbox.lvPieaugu
+3 more emails found

Phone Numbers (2)

291*****
295*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, indicating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No security.txt or incident response contacts are provided, which could improve vulnerability disclosure and incident handling. The absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with standard best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Rīgas Sv. Franciska Romas katoļu draudze

Description:

Rīgas Sv. Franciska Romas katoļu baznīca ir Romas katoļu Rīgas metropolijas Rīgas arhidiecēzes draudzes baznīca, kas atrodas Katoļu ielā 16, Rīgā, Latvijā.

Key Services:
Religious services and massesCommunity groups (choirs, youth groups, Sunday school, charity groups)Event hosting and announcementsDonation collection
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorjQueryGiveWP (donation plugin)FontAwesomeGoogle FontsSwiper.js
Frameworks:
Elementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
CookieYes
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress site using Elementor and GiveWP for donations.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mail.hostinger.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 46 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:franciskadraudze.lv
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/15/2025 (46 days)
SANs:franciskadraudze.lv, *.franciskadraudze.lv

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.188.55, 104.21.64.248
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3032::ac43:bc37, 2606:4700:3035::6815:40f8
Name Servers:
anita.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
garrett.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx2.hostinger.com
5: mx1.hostinger.com
SOA:Serial: 2377329310, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:210ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mail.hostinger.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, leveraging modern web technologies such as jQuery, Swiper.js for carousels, and FontAwesome for icons. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site includes a donation plugin (GiveWP) indicating e-commerce capabilities for donations. Performance is moderate with some caching and optimization plugins evident. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and mobile menu toggles. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small non-profit website.
Analyze Another Website