Skip to main content

Is franziskanerinnen.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Franziskanerinnen von der christlichen Liebe Reviews

franziskanerinnen.org favicon

Is franziskanerinnen.org Safe? Security Analysis for Franziskanerinnen von der christlichen Liebe

Check if franziskanerinnen.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitAustriasmall
WordPressYoast SEO pluginAvada ThemeWPML Multilingual CMSBorlabs Cookie+1 more
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 3:33:31 AM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Franziskanerinnen von der christlichen Liebe is a small non-profit religious organization based in Austria, focused on community service and spiritual mission. Their website reflects their dedication to making God's love tangible through their activities and outreach. The site is professionally designed using WordPress with the Avada theme and supports multiple languages, indicating a commitment to accessibility and outreach. Technically, the website employs modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and WPML for multilingual support, and Borlabs Cookie for cookie consent, demonstrating a reasonable level of digital maturity. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. No privacy policy or terms of service pages were found, which is a gap in compliance. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-maintained but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO pluginAvada ThemeWPML Multilingual CMSBorlabs CookieGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization operates in the non-profit religious sector, serving a local community in Vienna with spiritual and community services. Their business model is centered on religious mission rather than commercial activities. The website's multilingual capability suggests outreach beyond German-speaking audiences. The lack of explicit contact details and formal policies may limit engagement and trust for new visitors. The use of professional themes and SEO plugins indicates an intent to maintain a credible online presence. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The organization appears stable with consistent WHOIS data and domain registration aligned with their mission.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent mechanism, which are positive security practices. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others that enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which are important for transparency and readiness. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, limiting external security collaboration. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with additional headers and policy disclosures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Franziskanerinnen von der christlichen Liebe

Description:

Unsere Hingabe und das Bestreben, Gottes Liebe spürbar zu machen, verleihen unserem Tun Sinn und leiten uns täglich.

Key Services:
Religious community activitiesMissionary workSpiritual guidanceCommunity events
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO pluginAvada ThemeWPML Multilingual CMSBorlabs CookieGoogle Fonts
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and multilingual.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

43/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.hostedemail.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:dkim(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:admin@wpmudev.host
Forensic Reports:admin@wpmudev.host

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 70 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:5.132.161.146
Name Servers:
ns1.wpdns.hostDNS only
ns2.wpdns.hostDNS only
ns3.wpdns.hostDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.franziskanerinnen-wien.at.cust.b.hostedemail.com
SOA:Serial: 0, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:149ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.hostedemail.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme, a popular and feature-rich framework. It uses Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and WPML for multilingual support, indicating a mature technical setup. Borlabs Cookie plugin manages cookie consent, aligning with GDPR requirements. The site loads Google Fonts and Typekit resources for typography. Performance is moderate with some caching and minification evident. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO metadata is well implemented with Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. However, no advanced security headers or analytics services were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and analytics integration.
Analyze Another Website